Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2010, 9:34 am
In addition, since that interpretation implies that the ground for refusal under Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 40/94 is applicable only where all the essential characteristics of the sign are functional, it ensures that such a sign cannot be refused registration as a trade mark under that provision if the shape of the goods at issue incorporates a major non-functional element, such as a decorative or imaginative element which plays an important role in the shape.53 As regards the… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
The Hard Candy does feel a bit heavier, but not by much, and has an inner pocket for a few business cards.Bubble Sleeve iPad 2 + 1 (fits iPad 1 or 2, $49.95)Bubble Sleeve iPad CaseI really like this case, and if you’re the type who doesn’t like to add a “sleeve” to your iPad, you will too. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:38 am
It is true that while Article 1 of Schedule 1 refers to 'cross-objection', Article 3 of that Schedule does not refer to cross-objection as such but that in our opinion make no difference. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
The 86 Questions (as extracted by insideview.ie) 1. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:57 am
See also McBroom, 39 P.3d at 229 (holding that a driver does not violate the statute when he responds to “an apparent hazard” or when he has “some other valid reason for leaving his lane”); Crooks v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 9:47 am
Table 1. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:18 am
In Ontario, 39% of all lawyers are over the age of 50. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
Here's the table of votes. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 5:35 am
The Biden administration would require companies to deduct those costs over 39 years. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am
Section 1 of the 2021 Measure inserts sections 5A-5C into the Safeguarding and Clergy Discipline Measure 2016 concerning the Code. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 12:46 pm
The legal issue is whether United Dental is the "true" owner of the practice.They then provided a Management Contract dated February 1, 2013 [after the investigation was started] which revealed that United Dental got 35% of all net collections and was aggressively drafted in a way that gave United Dental control of the business. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
(See https://www.childsupport.ny.gov/dcse/pdfs/CSSA.pdf) Revised Forms for Use in Matrimonial Actions in Supreme Court were adopted effective March 1, 2020. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
Com. (1947) 30 Cal.2d 34, 39, 180 P.2d 11; Burlingham, at pp. 99–100, 137 P.2d 9.)Ayala, 59 Cal. 4th at 531. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:00 am
The Court found that YouTube is a passive website that does not specifically target customers in Tennessee, does not allow viewers to purchase products, and therefore does not constitute purposeful availment. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:01 pm
” (1:39:03 PM) Manning: i cant believe what im confessing to you :’( (1:40:20 PM) Manning: ive been so isolated so long… i just wanted to be nice, and live a normal life… but events kept forcing me to figure out ways to survive… smart enough to know whats going on, but helpless to do anything… no-one took any notice of me (1:40:43 PM) Manning: :’( (1:43:51 PM) Lamo: back (1:43:59 PM) Manning: im self… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:18 am
It should be: 1) Is there substantial similarity? [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:38 am
" Sjobring defined the class as all persons "[w]ho paid in whole or in part for a title insurance policy, from First American Title Company of Los Angeles and/or Does 1 through 249, which provided coverage for property located in the State of California . . . [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:20 pm
In the press conference announcing the charges, Corey made a point of declaring that her office does not prosecute people based upon public pressure, but rather only upon the facts and the law. [read post]
3 May 2007, 5:25 am
Canada's private sector privacy law mandates a review of the statute every five years. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Syndicat de la fonction publique et parapublique du Québec, 2018 SCC 39 (37543) Staff dismissals here are not protected by parliamentary privilege. [read post]
