Search for: "Downs v State" Results 1641 - 1660 of 40,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 1:37 pm by Ilya Somin
The First Amendment bars government from both forcing social media firms to take down content the state disapproves of and forcing them to put up content the firms themselves object to. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am by cassieq
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:55 am by Richard Ponzio
Ups & Downs: Shortly prior to the SOTF Ministerial Meeting, the President of the General Assembly (PGA), following intensive intergovernmental negotiations shepherded by the U.N. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Brackeen threatened to take down not only the Indian Child Welfare Act, but vast swaths of federal Indian policy and federal law. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
ACCC – draft guidelines released The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has similarly cracked down on greenwashing. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm by Bill Marler
State laboratories can send STEC cultures to the CDC to determine the serotype. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]