Search for: "FISH v. STATE" Results 1641 - 1660 of 3,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2010, 5:02 am by Beck, et al.
  Paraphrasing President Clinton, "the era of big fishing expeditions is over. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:40 pm
The court agreed with the Society with respect to one General Plan policy--that is, a General Plan policy that required the City to design mitigation "in coordination with" the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:43 am by admin
In a case which could possibly result in a reversal and/or modification of the Kreiner v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 8:59 am by admin
This one about the latest FBAR case, McBride v US. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:54 am
The Court of Appeals further explained the rationale for the statute in Bragg v Genesee County Agric. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:22 am
Accused employee does not have a right to discovery in Section 75 disciplinary proceedingsMatter of Utica City School Dist. v Fehlhaber, 59 AD3d 957The Utica City School District filed Section 75 disciplinary charges against Craig S. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am by Lyle Denniston
Masica — whether the National Park Service has the authority to ban fishing with a hovercraft on lands within a national park but owned by a state, an Indian entity, or private individuals [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Heffernan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:00 pm by Richard Frank
Supreme Court has granted review in what will be the first environmental case of its next (2012-13) Term: Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:47 am by Stephen Wermiel
Maine, a 1976 ruling on the boundary between the two states for lobster fishing rights. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:32 pm by Injury at Sea
The crew of the 74-foot fishing vessel Privateer called Station Grays Harbor watchstanders via VHF radio channel 16 at 2:26 p.m., stating they were taking on water through an 8-to-12-inch hole and preparing to abandon ship by deploying their life raft and donning immersion suits. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
 Master Clark considered the authorities including HHJ Hacon's interpretation of the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Ltd [2015] UKSC 10: "I interpret this to mean that in order to fix an alleged joint tortfeasor with liability, it must be shown both that he actively co-operated to bring about the act of the primary tortfeasor and also that he intended that his co-operation would help to bring about that act (the act found to be tortious). [read post]