Search for: "Gaines v. State" Results 1641 - 1660 of 9,718
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
More recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in favor of the defendant in Wood v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 10:38 am
The Court of Justice handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-266/05 P Sison v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 2:13 pm by Liisa Speaker
Just a few months ago, it acted similarly in its published decision regarding custody of a child between two same sex parents that were legally married in another state, as described in this blog for Usitalo v Landon. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Toulson stated that considering the principles of Target Holdings v Redfern, a monetary reward which reflects neither loss caused nor profit gained by the wrongdoer, such as the one argued by the appellant, would be penal. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 10:00 am by John Baker
States not likely to gain or lose a congressional district care most about federal funding. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:58 pm
Please...The Anti-Google Bill And An Apology from LG Preface:   My apologies, but a loyal geeker just pointed out...United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 3:01 am by John Jascob
The adviser argued that those holdings created conflicts between state and federal laws regarding the fiduciary duty owed to investors in hedge funds and regarding the imposition of seller liability (Ellrich v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Katie Calogero and Daniel Alvarado
Now, we want to share some insights we gained while conducting the same analysis of bid protest decisions at the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC” or the “Court”). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is often said (and sometimes sanctimoniously) that the legal malpractice claimant is simply trying to gain an advantage, or to avoid paying legal fees. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:45 am by Thomas Schober
It’s too bad the United States Supreme Court didn’t issue its ruling in Comptroller v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:08 am by Charles Rubin
Section 301.7701-3(c)(1)(v)(C) and the form instructions allow this to be done just by filing a Form 2553, without the need for a Form 8832. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:08 am by Charles Rubin
Section 301.7701-3(c)(1)(v)(C) and the form instructions allow this to be done just by filing a Form 2553, without the need for a Form 8832. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
The Wall Street Journal reported today that the Wisconsin trade secrets case of United States v. [read post]