Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 7,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am
NAC was found liable on a breach of contract claim in an underlying action against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:29 pm
California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975) and its progeny; and in holding that a finding that Mr. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
They decide -- under the watchful eye of the jailers -- whether the dude is in good standing with the gang. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:17 pm
Ultimately, Chief Justice Roberts concluded that the Court was confused in Williamson County because there really was no good reason for the “state litigation rule. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
Good Causes and Bad Science. 63 VAND. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
” Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:16 pm
In Nash v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
The City of Los Angeles recently filed two separate lawsuits in California state court concerning substantial losses it allegedly suffered as a result of municipal bonds it previously issued.The first lawsuit, entitled City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:00 am
As we rang in the new year, CBL committed to post some ideas about how to improve three problematic areas of California law, making them less business-unfriendly while maintaining California's position as a very pro-consumer, pro-green state. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Pereira v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
On the other hand, other decisions from federal district courts in California have found that plaintiffs must do no more than plead the elements of a section 1595 claim, including in a case where a Jane Doe plaintiff sued the same defendants that Plaintiffs sue here—those entities that own and operate Pornhub—on very similar grounds. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 11:21 am
California Teachers Association and Yohn v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 8:19 am
See New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 4:47 pm
In our last post of 2016, I was complaining about the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
The judge, after announcing he agreed with the jury's decision, nonetheless overturned the verdict stating he felt obliged to follow the holding of Minder v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 9:53 am
But as that post pointed out, in Burlage v. [read post]
