Search for: "HM"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 12:56 pm
HM) ta?? [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:23 am
HM özetle "harç ödenmeden ilam tebli? [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:07 am
Market segments endorsements, like ISO form MS HM 01 07 07, Hotels, Motels and Inns, defines the term “suspension” as, “the slowdown or cessation of your business activities. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:48 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bloom & Ors v The Pensions Regulator & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1124 (14 October 2011) HM Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 1156 (14 October 2011) Estafnous v London & Leeds Business Centres Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1157 (14 October 2011) Williams & Anor v Hinton & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1123 (14 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Stewart & Ors, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 2296 (14 October 2011) High Court… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:47 am
HM Advocate v P [2011] UKSC 44; [2011] WLR (D) 290 “There was no absolute rule that evidence which had been obtained from an accused who had been questioned by police when he had not been given access to legal advice, but which existed independently of his answers, was inadmissible.” WLR Daily, 6th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The case of HM Advocate v Cadder [2010] UKSC 43, [2010] All ER (D) 251 (Oct) saw the Supreme Court determine that Scottish police could no longer question suspects without a lawyer present, and the court’s ruling has caused significant disquiet as police forces have been forced to change their procedures as a result. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The case of HM Advocate v Cadder [2010] UKSC 43, [2010] All ER (D) 251 (Oct) saw the Supreme Court determine that Scottish police could no longer question suspects without a lawyer present, and the court’s ruling has caused significant disquiet as police forces have been forced to change their procedures as a result. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:57 am
Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal, Oban); HM Advocate v M; HM Advocate v G [2011] UKSC 43; [2011] WLR (D) 288 “In principle the line as to when access to legal advice had to be provided before a person suspected of a criminal offence was questioned by police should be drawn as from the moment when he had been taken into police custody, or his freedom of action had been significantly curtailed.” WLR Daily, 6th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
Ambrose Harris (Procurator Fiscal), HM Advocate v G : HM Advocate v M [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) – read judgment Reliance on evidence that emerged from questioning a person without access to a lawyer did not invariably breach the right to a fair trial under Article 6. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:38 am
This order is made against HM Revenue and Customs and you will need to provide your spouses date of birth, NI number if you have it and also their last known address. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 1:45 pm
Now you'd think I'd get the hint that he had something important to share with me, but as I am wont to do, I tried (and failed) double-tasking as long as I could, assuring my husband that I was hanging onto his every word by grunting a few "mm-hms" and "uh-huhs" every thirty seconds while clicking away on my keyboard, eyes locked on my computer. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm
Hm...okay...well, let's see how to do this. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:07 am
The figures show that the Cabinet Office, which, along with Ministry Defence, was required to sign an undertaking by the Information Commissioner earlier this year to improve compliance, answered less than half of requests within 20 working days.Ranked in order of their performance in meeting the 20 working day deadline (number of requests received in brackets), the list of departments is as follows:Department of Health 99% (417)Attorney General's Office 98% (42) Department of Culture Media and… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:47 pm
Hm. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
making recommendations to bodies other than the PRA and FCA (such as HM Treasury and the BoE); ? [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:12 pm
HM Revenue and Customs Similarly, the Finance Act 2010 requires HM Revenue and Customs to apply a “fit and proper person” test to managers of charities in order for those charities to fall within the remit of Gift Aid. [read post]
