Search for: "Harris v. United States"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2014, 2:09 pm
Harris, 338 N.C. 211, 223 n.1 (1994); see also United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:40 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Harris, or in the best interest of society. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:13 am
United States, when the justices fracture such that there is no majority reasoning supporting a Supreme Court judgment, lower courts are to regard the narrowest opinion that supplies the requisite fifth vote as the majority holding of the court. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
So, although the case came out correctly in the end, it took a review by the United States Supreme Court to get it right. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
” Article II, Section 2 provides that the “President shall…have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
Green card holders live in the United States as our neighbors and serve in our Armed Forces. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm
– Jackson, Mississippi attorney Philip Thomas on the blog Mississippi Litigation Review and Commentary Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 10/13/14: Hobby Lobby Implementation; Jumping the Gun on a Final Rule; Extended Waters of the United States; and EPA Rules to Watch – Washington, DC lawyer Lee Beck on his blog, the Federal Regulations Advisor For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 6:28 pm
They also noted that the National Alliance is a lawful corporation in good standing and had no criminal convictions either in Canada or the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
State, Baldwin v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
” However, entry to the United States under that statute is limited to two years. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:32 am
Tatel, and Harry T. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
The United States has provided assurances that Julian Assange would not receive the death penalty in the event that he is extradited. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Some state laws, however, allow plaintiffs to recover damages for enforcing the state equivalent of Title III provisions. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Harris. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:04 am
In Harris v. [read post]
