Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 1641 - 1660 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2019, 2:28 pm by Kyle T. Mordew
Our last case law discussion comes to us from the Ohio Supreme Court in Embassy Healthcare v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
Neither the parties’ prenuptial agreement nor New York law “requires that a gift of land from a husband to a wife be evidenced by a writing explicitly stating the husband’s intent. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:30 pm by Orin Kerr
As reconstructed, the statute now punishes a person who, “knowing he has a wife or she has a husband or knowing the other person has a husband or wife,” then enters into a purportedly state sanctioned marriage. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 12:48 am by Dave
  It concerns whether Mr Brand was living with Ms Mabott as her husband for the purposes of succcession to Ms Mabott’s tenancy: s 17(4), Housing Act 1988. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 12:48 am by Dave
  It concerns whether Mr Brand was living with Ms Mabott as her husband for the purposes of succcession to Ms Mabott’s tenancy: s 17(4), Housing Act 1988. [read post]
Common law marriages occur when two people of the opposite sex have lived together as husband and wife, but have never officiated their relationship through license and ceremony. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The ex-husband brought this post-divorce civil action against his ex-wife and Alan L. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Justice Palmieri denied the husbands request for a counsel fee. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:34 pm by familoo
This is the one where the Wifes father appears from press reports to be holding the whole case hostage as he has threatened to cut off the wife if she gives the husband a penny (in sketch form) (h/t Carol Mashembo). [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 7:28 pm
However, once in a while I have seen situations where property rights are claimed in a property which is titled in neither the husbands or wifes name. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:39 am by INFORRM
  The Court held that the wife could not use documents which were obtained from her husbands computer in ancillary relief proceedings and disapproved the “Hildebrand” rules. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It's all in the minutia of the divorce dollars. in Sevey v Friedlander ; 2011 NY Slip Op 02978 ;Decided on April 14, 2011 ;Appellate Division, Third Department we see that even the purchase of a car by husband is factored into the mix. [read post]