Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 1641 - 1660 of 182,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2024, 4:16 am by Benson Varghese
It’s also something that’s easy to miss as an attorney, if you don’t know what you are looking for. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:16 am by Benson Varghese
It’s also something that’s easy to miss as an attorney, if you don’t know what you are looking for. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am by Eleonora Rosati
Interesting about Netflix's trade mark strategy is that the video streaming service did not appeal the decision and instead successfully registered a multimedia trade mark two years later, consisting of the originally filed gong sound and a video with the Netflix emblem (no. 018140429; you can listen to the sound file here).ConclusionThe analysis of the case law of the CJEU and the EUIPO illustrates the difficulties that companies face when registering sound marks in… [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The court held that the provisions are unconstitutional under a state constitutional amendment adopted by referendum in 2022 which grants every individual a fundamental right to reproductive freedom and provides that an "individual’s right to reproductive freedom shall not be denied, burdened, nor infringed upon unless justified by a compelling state interest achieved by the least restrictive means. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am by Dylan Gibbs
The Court didn’t rule on the principal’s search tactics because it wasn’t necessary. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:37 pm by Josh Blackman
Meanwhile, the Court's conservatives have shown no ability, or even interest, to bringing around Barrett. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:25 pm by Stephen Halbrook
"  Still, she conceded that "the Second Amendment does not yield automatically to the Government's compelling interest," and we should recall that she did not dissent in the per curiam Caetano v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:57 pm by Josh Blackman
Likewise, this Court has held that "[t]here is always a public interest in prompt execution" of the law, absent a showing of its unconstitutionality. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:01 pm
(And make sure you don't spend it in the interim so there's only two hundred grand left. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm by Ilya Somin
It's noteworthy that the record analyzed by the [Fifth Circuit] doesn't seem to include any examples of direct, unequivocal threats, such as "If you don't take down X, I will inflict punishment Y. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:09 pm by The Murray Law Firm
” WSPA.com is reporting, “[t]he Greenville County Coroner’s Office said 22-year-old Rogers Treyvond Robinson was shot at the hotel and brought to the hospital where he died from his injuries. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:47 pm by The Murray Law Firm
As reported by KWCH.com, “[t]he Wichita Police Department is investigating a shooting at the Emery Garden Apartments, 4244 S. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:47 pm by The Murray Law Firm
(WBTV.com) Did negligent security contribute to this hotel shooting and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family? [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:46 pm by The Murray Law Firm
 The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the deceased victim’s family and any injured victims retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
[W]e join our sister circuits and hold that a party may proceed under a fictitious name only in those limited circumstances where the party's need for anonymity outweighs countervailing interests in full disclosure…. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Asheesh Agarwal
Justice Department’s (DOJ) Antitrust Division (DOJ) in response to your Request for Information on Corporate Consolidation Through Serial Acquisitions and Roll-Up Strategies (RFI). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
Surely there's nothing wrong with government officials asking platforms not to host such disclosures by users.Indeed, so long as the government is really just asking, it doesn't matter whether it's doing so in pursuit of a vital interest such as national security or public health or for some less worthy purpose. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:11 am by Sadie Mayhew
His legal team and supporters continue to argue that his actions were in the public interest and protected by the First Amendment. [read post]