Search for: "In Re IT Group, Inc., Co." Results 1641 - 1660 of 2,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2007, 8:58 pm
res=9A01E1D71231F933A15756C0A9619C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=2. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Eugene Volokh
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:21 am by Scott Hervey
  In re Uinta Brewing Company, the TTAB found persuasive eleven websites that showed breweries also selling wine; In re Sugarlands Distilling Company, LLC, the TTAB cited five examples of wineries also engaged in distillation and the sale of spirits; In re Sonoma Estate Vintners, LLC, the TTAB found persuasive fifteen registrations showing that various entities registered a single mark for wine and beer. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 4:57 am
(TTABlogged here).In re IP Carrier Consulting Group, 84 USPQ2d 1028 (TTAB 2007) [precedential]. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:21 am by Scott Hervey
  In re Uinta Brewing Company, the TTAB found persuasive eleven websites that showed breweries also selling wine; In re Sugarlands Distilling Company, LLC, the TTAB cited five examples of wineries also engaged in distillation and the sale of spirits; In re Sonoma Estate Vintners, LLC, the TTAB found persuasive fifteen registrations showing that various entities registered a single mark for wine and beer. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:36 pm
  If you’re one of those investors, give me a call at 1.877.308.7900 or email angel@reyeslaw.com for a confidential assessment of your claim. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under ‘preponderance’… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm by Guest Blogger
He currently serves as co-chair for the HNBA Lawyers’ Assistance Committee, was a former member of the ABA Commission on Lawyer Assistance Programs, and sat on the board of The Other Bar, Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Co., 464 U.S. at 508, 509 (quoting Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:07 am
Skadden Restructuring Co-Head Decamping for Lazard The American Lawyer Timothy Pohl, one of three co-heads of Skadden Arps' 100-lawyer corporate restructuring group, announced on Thursday that he will leave the firm next month to become a managing director in the restructuring group at financial services firm Lazard. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Spicy IP), India: Supreme Court on exclusive marketing rights: (Spicy IP), Japan: First induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell patent at Kyoto University: (Competitive Info), Slovenia: Supplementary protection certificates in Slovenia: (The SPC Blog), United States: Biotech/pharma lobbying scoreboard – second quarter update – part II: (Patent Docs), United States: Ferring Pharmaceuticals argues to bring down direct purchaser suits: (Law 360), United States: Transferred… [read post]