Search for: "In Re Morris" Results 1641 - 1660 of 1,816
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 6:16 am
Philip Morris Inc., 621 N.W.2d 2, 13 (Minn. 2001).That's nice.But wait! [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:31 pm
Though not as busy a day as yesterday, we're still seeing a good flow of content this afternoon. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:08 am
Prof Morris: Subject matter questions should be avoided. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 5:46 pm
"If we can look into their private Internet and look into what they're doing and they're contacting somebody they shouldn't be, that's going to help stop them," Lizenby said.But Morris aims to change that.More than a decade ago, Morris was convicted of child molestation. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:34 pm
"It seems to be, in our estimation, a pretty clear violation of the fourth amendment when you're not on parole or probation," said Ken Falk, the ACLU of Indiana's legal director.The ACLU is not challenging the requirement to consent to computer searches as a condition of parole or probation. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:33 pm
Morris Davis, an Air Force Judge Advocate and the Pentagon's former chief prosecutor responsible for bringing charges against the detainees at Guantánamo, has retired from the Air Force, effective November 1, according to the Air Force Times. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:34 am
These instructions are designed to take into account the Supreme Court's recent decision in Philip Morris. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (IAM)DSS case: Europe’s patent demise: (IPEG),EU calls on US to fulfill TRIPS obligations re copyright: (The IP Factor),How to safeguard unprotected know-how in FP7 projects: (IPR Helpdesk),European Council calls for a free movement of knowledge: (IPR-Helpdesk),Madrid amendments for double-treatied Union members: (IPKat),Proposed Europe-wide rules governing biometric passports are still unsatisfactory despite some concessions, according to European Data Protection Supervisor:… [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:26 pm
Once we're in the business of reasoning out extra-compensatory damages to reach a non-absurd result, we should be able to offer relevant reasons for our decisions. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:12 pm
This kind of scaling to wealth or value is important for four reasons: it avoids emit-ting the wrong signals to the public about the worth of poor people in cases involving physical injury; it facilitates rational jury decision making; it helps reduce, but does not eliminate, the problem of the diminishing utility of money; and last, it provides reasonable incentives for plaintiffs' lawyers to take cases even after Philip Morris. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 6:41 am
Snyder's Louisiana, we'd be # 2, but their score was wind-assisted, which is hardly fair):Investigators believe House went to see his ex-girlfriend Monday night who was at her current boyfriend Daniel Morris' house.Police say the girlfriend claims while House was talking to Morris he pulled out a gun and shot Morris in the face killing him then allegedly pointed the gun at the woman, but told her he couldn't kill her adding that that if he… [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:54 pm
The New Yorker's Philip Gourevitch and Errol Morris write:Sabrina Harman also said she felt herself growing numb at Abu Ghraib, yet she kept being startled by her capacity to feel fresh shocks. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:29 pm
While the account here promises to makes sense of the Court's holding in Philip Morris,[13] the goal of this project is not to interpret punitive damages doctrine as it is, but to re-imagine what the law should be. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:55 pm
  A word of advice to Levin:  Consider combining a JD with that Wharton MBA you're pursuing. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 8:35 am
According to the Economist, Charles Morris is the first to really assess the current crisis of the financial market in his book The Trillion Dollar Meltdown: He describes three trends converging to create the bubble: By 2006 the growing trend towards deregulation had pushed three-quarters of all lending outside the purview of regulators. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
   Specifically, the question is, what does the Court of Appeal do when the US Supremes tells it to re-analyze a $55 million punitive damages award, already reduced twice, in light of Philip-Morris USA v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:13 pm
Perhaps they're misleading, or even false by necessary implication.)In any event, all three factors pointed towards extraterritorial application of the Lanham Act. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:32 am
We're keeping our fingers crossed that this means the end of winter. [read post]