Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C" Results 1641 - 1660 of 9,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2024, 5:37 am by Jon Hyman
Four states already prohibit all employment-related non-compete agreements, and other nine (plus D.C.) limit them based on income. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 1:14 pm by Ajay Sarma
Sarma also shared an opinion from the D.C. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:47 am by Taylor E. Whitten
In a victory for common sense, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., refused to enforce the Board’s conclusion. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am by Steve Vladeck
If that doesn’t go to the commission’s “subject-matter jurisdiction,” what does? [read post]
1 May 2009, 7:17 pm
Mark Levy always got to the office before meâ€â [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:57 am by Editors
Fannie Mae’s GC has some ideas: “Before he was hiring law firms, Fannie Mae’s General Counsel Brian Brooks was helping run one — from 2008 to 2011, he served as managing partner in O’Melveny & Meyers’ Washington, D.C., office….Brooks argues that, because clients increasingly refuse to pay for expensive associate work, the law firm profit model — which depends on “leverage,” or the difference between associate and partner hours… [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 12:11 pm by Marissa Cohen
  In between the assassination of five Dallas police officers on July 7 and the ambush attack that claimed the lives of three Baton Rouge cops on July 17, officers in Georgia, Michigan, Washington, D.C., Tennessee and Missouri have been targeted for violence. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 10:44 am
For the most part, law profs do not seem to matter that much to ATL. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:54 am
The American Bar Association recently held its Ninth National Institute on the Civil False Claims Act and Qui Tam Enforcement ("National Institute") in Washington, D.C. [read post]
Capitol in Washington, D.C., and the strong possibility of more riots, violence, and protests across the nation bring up a legal and ethical dilemma for employers: Can a company terminate or discipline a worker because he or she participated in a riot or even the protest preceding a riot? [read post]