Search for: "In re D. W."
Results 1641 - 1660
of 4,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Chanel, Apple, Bayer, LVMH (and more) write to President Juncker on revision to IP Enforcement Directive | Is German SEP litigation set to increase with the "confidentiality club decision" of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf? [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
All of this could have been stopped much earlier if either the PTO had possessed sufficient information to see that the statutory requirements for incontestability had not been met or the courts had understood those statutory requirements and independently examined whether they’d been satisfied.There are other recent examples with similarly tortured histories. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 11:46 am
And yes, I know you’d rather still have the money. 9, Don’t make up stuff. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
However, the Ninth Circuit held that the law didn’t restrict what the practitioner could say or recommend to a patient or client, and thus the law “regulate[d] conduct” even though it covered the verbal aspects of SOCE therapy. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
” (W. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 10:38 am
Box d. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:41 pm
” D. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Thomas, supra.The court goes on to explain that[w]hile shoplifting is ordinarily understood to mean theft of merchandise from a store (In re J.L. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am
I hope that this will sort out soon because we’re a nation at war. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
“You’re basically saying we shouldn’t look at it,” he told Purcell. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am
In re Hruby, 1967. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm
If you’re using Wikipedia for low-risk natural languages training, you get the bias of the people who edit Wikipedia. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:39 am
CONTU specified specific amendments & Congress followed, but you’re not happy w/specificity of results—any reason to think it would be better this time? [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:15 am
Die UBS erklärt ausserdem, dass die Daten «streng vertraulich» behandelt würden. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Legal Counsel during the George W. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:03 pm
They’re looking for work, out of the labor force but unhappy about it, or report working part-time when they’d prefer more hours, according to data released last week. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:11 am
You’ll make any changes on a federal form W-4. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
” Review of agency decisions under § 706(2)(D), “without observance of procedure required by law,” is “strict” and “without deference. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a 2011 paper published in the Administrative Law Review, Adam Finkel of the University of Pennsylvania Law School and Jason W. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
W., 576 F. [read post]
