Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 1641 - 1660
of 13,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 9:59 pm
I.e., you're a lawyer, think you are "special" and believe you're entitled to a standard that would embarrass a drunken bellhop. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:59 pm
I.e., you're a lawyer, think you are "special" and believe you're entitled to a standard that would embarrass a drunken bellhop. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:54 am
”* But Elmore understands its hard to be respectful to police if they’re not respectful in return. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
Is this the change we're supposed to believe in? [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 12:11 pm
That goes far beyond strategic distancing.It is now clear that President Obama's chances of re-election are becoming more daunting by the day. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 4:47 am
With the US Supreme Court this week revisiting at oral argument the question of requiring confrontation at trial for lab reports (i.e., giving the defense the right to cross-examine the lab worker), I found this anecdote from DA Confidential a particularly compelling example of why the right to vigorously question forensic evidence is important, regardless of complaints about "inefficiency" and cost. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:09 am
 One key question that arises is whether statements made to the defense lawyer or his investigator are discoverable, even if they're inculpatory. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 8:52 am
The outpour of public reaction to AB 394 paints a dramatic picture of the diametrically opposed, and passionate viewpoints that people (i.e. your employees) have about sexual orientation and gender identity.So let’s start with the basics. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:10 am
Interestingly, for those defendants that will become involved in suits pertaining to older patents (i.e., pre- ‘99 filings) after enactment, but before the anniversary, options at the USPTO will actually expand upon the one year anniversary. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
See In re Citx Corp., 448 F.3d at 677-681. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 12:59 am
The US Court of Appeal of the Federal Circuit (CAFC) recently considered the interaction between two peculiarities of the US patent system, patent term adjustment (PTA) and obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) (In re Cellect LLC). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:14 am
They’re starting with solos. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 10:04 pm
Per In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 471 F.3d 24 (2d Cir. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Kozlowski, 80 N.J. 378(1979); In re: Estate of Roccamonte, 174 N.J. 381 (2002); Devaney v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:48 pm
The In re Servaas decision including all concurrences and dissents is here. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
"If the Governor signs AB 927, that seems like it'll largely moot the underlying judicial dispute, albeit probably not retrospectively (i.e., for fines and assessments imposed prior to the statute). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 4:49 am
Will you place limits on access to confidential information (i.e., background checks or workplace investigation reports)? [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
If you're still living with your spouse while separated then you need to discuss items of daily living and interaction. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:18 am
Pro se litigants sometimes read this blog, so if you're a pro se litigant who wants to take an appeal to the Court of Appeals, this one's for you.The case is Elliott v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:00 pm
So long as the case is filed during the period of time that the car creditor still has the car in its possession, filing a bankruptcy will prevent the creditor from re-selling the car. [read post]
