Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2" Results 1641 - 1660 of 1,946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Taber, Environmental & Climate Change Law News, June 2, 2010 On May 28, 2010, the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:01 pm by David Lat
If you’re a Minnesota lawyer interested in running for the judgeship, there are more details about the petition procedure in the Pioneer Press. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:47 pm by amanda rachel
(2) Each time you leave the United States your re-entry is viewed as an application for re-admission. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:43 pm by Stewart Baker
 It’s a signature initiative of blue-dog Democrats like Heath Shuler. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
” The Florida Supreme Court, 5-2, in Kirk Douglas Williams v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
Mon River now has the right to petition the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a rule they have interpretative supremacy with regard to the EPC because their decisions are subject to review only under the narrowly defined conditions of A 112(1) and A 112a(2). [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
” [via Lexisone] Week of May 2,  2010: noncapital  (initial list) Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Initially, she served as Associate White House Counsel. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Vol. 2, No. 13, May 3, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm by cdw
” For the Warden or State In re Bruce Webster, 2010 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:52 pm by cdw
” [via FindLaw] In re William Josef Berkley,  2010 U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
(not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARRERA for welding helmets: In re A.C.E. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am by Erin Miller
To our knowledge, the Court has re-listed just the following case from previous editions of Petitions to Watch for the conference of April 16: Ransom v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:14 pm by Barry Herman
  SiRF and the Commission Investigative Staff petitioned for review of several of ALJ Charneski’s rulings, but the ITC determined to review only three:  (1) whether GL had standing to assert the ‘346 patent, (2) whether SiRF directly infringed the ‘651 patent, and (3) whether SiRF directly infringed the ‘000 patent. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
This action is part of a multi-year enforcement initiative to improve compliance with the Construction General Permit. [read post]