Search for: "In re Interest of Steven S."
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 11:58 am
Steven Pinker, who is actually skeptical about claims of racial differences in intelligence: The year 2005 saw several public appearances of what will I predict will become the dangerous idea of the next decade: that groups of people may differ genetically in their average talents and temperaments. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from Alan Gover. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Another review of Bill Barnhart’s and Gene Schlickman’s forthcoming biography of John Paul Stevens is at the Christian Science Monitor. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Auditors I’m sure Francine McKenna, of re: The Auditors, would be interested to see their findings regarding auditors. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm
Reed, which was Justice Stevens’ last argued case. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
Judge Crabb also denied Quanta's motions for a re-trial and for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
Bopp claimed, but its interest was in combating fraud and also in correcting errors. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
Only it’s not. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
" Interesting argument: does this mean that, at least theoretically, the rights these amendments bestow vary based on the year of the state's admission? [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
(Disclosure: We're co-counsel for respondents, along with Public Justice and the Hardy Law Firm of Reno, Nevada.) [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Criminal Law The most significant area of the law in which Judge Garland’s views obviously differ materially from those of Justice Stevens is criminal law. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Stevens, which struck down on First Amendment grounds the federal statute banning creation or sale of depictions of animal cruelty. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
[19] In the past, football and basketball unions have used the threat of anti-trust litigation as a way to further the interests of their players. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:04 am
There are too many interests, commercial and consumer alike, that could be severely affected if the Supreme Court held otherwise. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 6:41 am
” Such incentives, Justice Breyer concluded, would not further Congress’s purpose of “promot[ing] the interests of employees and their beneficiaries in employee benefit plans. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:42 am
It is certainly possible writing from some remove to overstate the impact Rutledge’s evolving views in the 1940’s had on Justice Stevens’ thinking some 60 years later. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
Stevens, a case about videos of animal cruelty. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:32 pm
By the time Chevron came down, the Court had long recognized – as Justice Stevens reiterated in that decision – that executive views could help illuminate statutory meaning when the executive has special expertise in the face of a “regulatory scheme [that] is technical and complex,” when competing policy interests are at stake, and when it is clear the agency’s consideration of the matter had been “detailed and reasoned. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 11:45 am
Isn’t the league entitled to know whether they’re pitchers or catchers? [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 8:01 am
I was a little surprised to see that Marc Randazza found the reasoning in Jon Katz's argument compelling: I wish for Stevens to be an opportunity not only to celebrate and strengthen the First Amendment, but also for people to re-examine their relationship with and treatment of all animals, both of different species and their own species. [read post]
