Search for: "International Lighting Corp." Results 1641 - 1660 of 1,834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
On the one hand, it reflects concerns of international comity insofar as it ‘serves to protect against unintended clashes between our laws and those of other nations which could result in international discord. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 2:18 pm
In light of the parties' stipulation, the Board overruled the objection. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
The new chief of the Antitrust Division, Christine Varney, today published an advance text of a speech she gave yesterday at the Center for American Progress. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
In this line of authority the court has taken the view that a claim for (what is really) defamation has been dressed up in the guise of another cause of action, breach of confidence (See Service Corp International plc v Channel Four [1999] EMLR 83 and Tillery Valley Foods Ltd v Channel Four [2004] EWHC 1075 (Ch)) for instance, in an attempt to get round the rule in Bonnard v Perryman and take advantage of the relatively beneficent American Cyanamid or section 12 HRA… [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:07 am by Mike Aylward
2007:  The Year of The Pig   New Nasty Claim Threat:                 Contingent Commissions     Athletic Achievement:                      Tiger Woods Furthest Fall from Grace:                 Dickie… [read post]
“[T]he Zapata procedure takes the case away from the [derivative] plaintiff” and “turns his allegations over to special agents appointed on behalf of the corporation for the purpose of making an informal, internal investigation of his charges. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
(I need to preface this post with a caveat:  It is very long because it addresses difficult issues involved in deciding when a Public Records Act applies to a state employee's use of his/her cell phone to conduct official business. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Citing her dissent in Bath Iron Works Corp., 345 NLRB No. 33 (2005), affd. sub nom. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
On June 25, Judge Davidson reopened the arbitration and asked for additional briefing in light of Ritchie.[2] On July 9, 2014, Elizabeth Kidd, the Director of ADR Services, e-mailed the parties informing them that the Award was attached to her e-mail, and that Judge Davidson "has also asked me to forward his original ruling which was drafted prior to the Ri[t]chie v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
 According to Sea Port Products Corp., the recalled products are not intended for retail sale. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 7:45 am by Dan Maurer
Congress has an interest in things besides conflict, including the health and future prospects of international relations, and those things require money. [read post]