Search for: "Jess Bravin" Results 1641 - 1660 of 1,908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
"Kennedy's School-Press Incident Wasn't the First": Today in The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin has an article that begins, "Justice Anthony Kennedy got into a messy situation this month after a widely circulated report that his office made a school newspaper get permission before running an article about the justice. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm
On Tuesday, Justice Kennedy talked to the WSJ's Supreme Court correspondent, Jess Bravin, about the incident, saying he was frustrated by the criticism of his response to the school newspaper's coverage and calling it a misunderstanding that spiraled out of control. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:22 am
"Defendant's Words May Help 9/11 Case": Jess Bravin has this article today in The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:22 am
Finally, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that Justice Sonia Sotomayor will not be posing for Annie Leibowitz and Vogue because of her busy schedule. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
According to the WSJ's Jess Bravin, a threshold question awaits. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 3:11 pm
All Justices, according to the Wall Street Journal’s Supreme Court correspondent Jess Bravin, appeared to be “sceptical and at times scornful ... to arguments that there should be broader patent protection for ‘business methods’”. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:44 pm
According to WSJ Supreme Court correspondent Jess Bravin, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey said the decision to try the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks in criminal court represented a turn from the Bush administration's war footing to a "Sept. 10, 2001? [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:56 am
Back in February, the WSJ's Supreme Court correspondent Jess Bravin penned a column for the WSJ's Law Journal column on the legal principle of standing. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:02 am
According to Jess Bravin, the Journal's Supreme Court correspondent, the justices were on Monday "skeptical and at times scornful reception to arguments that there should be broader patent protection for "business methods," which several justices suggested did little to spur the technological progress that patent laws were intended to promote. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:14 pm
In Tuesday's edition of The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin will have an article headlined "Life Terms for Youth Offenders Reviewed. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:32 pm
" And earlier, in today's edition of The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin has an article headlined "Justices to Study Patents on Business Methods. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:51 am
Before he hopped on a flight to China on Saturday he asked Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal how to find the show in Shanghai. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
WSJ Supreme Court correspondent Jess Bravin sent along this post on Saturday — also up on the WSJ’s arts and entertainment blog, Speakeasy and WashWire, the Journal’s politics blog — on former U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:32 am
  (Also at that link, Jess Bravin gives a hesitant prediction of a 5-4 victory for the former inmates.) [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:22 pm
We checked in with WSJ Supreme Court reporter Jess Bravin to find out how the arguments went. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 6:03 am
According to Jess Bravin, the WSJ’s Supreme Court correspondent, the answer seems to be the latter. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
According to the WSJ’s Jess Bravin and Jane Kim, a ruling for shareholders could push down fees that last year approached $100 billion by some estimates in the $10 trillion industry. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 12:13 pm
(Click here for a nice piece from last year from Supreme Court reporter Jess Bravin on the issue of standing.) [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
  At the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Jane J. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:44 am
"Fees Case Strikes at Heart of Mutual Funds; Supreme Court to Weigh How Much Money-Management Firms Can Charge; Defining Fiduciary Duty": Jess Bravin and Jane J. [read post]