Search for: "Kelly v. State" Results 1641 - 1660 of 2,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:28 am
Finally, a reminder in Webber v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Mike Kelly brought slates of fake electors to his office, a claim that was immediately disputed. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The Court’s Decision The decision by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Kelly A. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm by NL
The private law decision may be unfettered, but that does not exclude public law controls - for example terminating a local authority tenancy at the time before they had statutory security of tenure, Cannock Chase DC v Kelly [1978] 1 WLR 1. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:04 pm by NL
The private law decision may be unfettered, but that does not exclude public law controls - for example terminating a local authority tenancy at the time before they had statutory security of tenure, Cannock Chase DC v Kelly [1978] 1 WLR 1. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
Proud Boy Dominic Pezzola and Oath Keepers Kelly Meggs, Roberto Minuta, and Jessica Watkins were also singled out during the hearings. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Today's essay will focus on the second point, harnessing evidence from an order the Court issued yesterday in Ward v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am by Yishai Schwartz
Following the events of Nov. 13 summarized in the last post in this series, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened on Tuesday, Nov. 14 to continue testimony and the “preadmission” of evidence relating to physical evidence from the site of the attack on the USS Cole, identified as Appellate Exhibit 207. [read post]