Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 1641 - 1660 of 4,886
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 12:37 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the Court’s opinion, which was joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Thomas is in agreement (at least as to judgment) with the Chief 69% of the time, with Scalia 77 % of the time, and Kennedy 65 % of the time. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:41 am by John Timmer
Scalia, Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, And Alito determined that this was an invalid approach. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:58 am by Ruthann Robson
Over at his eponymous blog, CUNY-Brooklyn Political Science professor Corey Robin has an interesting take on the controversial passage from Justice Thomas's dissent in Obergefell criticizing the "dignity" rationale of Kennedy's opinion for the Court by stating in part that... [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy and Clarence Thomas have joined his opinion, with some concurrences, as we’ll soon find out. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:53 am by Amy Howe
In a decision by Justice Samuel Alito that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas, the Court began with a look backward, at the history of the death penalty in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 10:37 am by Tom Goldstein
  I treat four Justices as sitting to the Court’s right:  Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:04 am by Bill Otis
Bush for Clarence Thomas, both of whom shredded the Breyer dissent. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am by Rory Little
” Justice Anthony Kennedy similarly concurred only in the judgment, agreeing in one paragraph with Justice Alito that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague and with Justice Thomas that under the residual clause as written, a conviction for possession of a short-barreled shotgun does not qualify as a “violent felony. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:41 am
And like Justices Thomas and Scalia, Ed and I may also disagree about the degree to which “precedent” — or the rulings of dead justices — should trump original meaning. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:58 am by JB
But Thomas is not really engaging with Kennedy's argument. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 7:24 am by Richard M. Re
Finally, Justice Alito dissented on grounds partly endorsed by Kennedy and Thomas. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In an unusual move, each dissenting Justice (Chief Justice Roberts together with Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito) filed a separate opinion. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:11 am by Lovechilde
  According to Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kennedy's carefully reasoned opinion was result-oriented and "had nothing to do with the Constitution. [read post]