Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 156,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2024, 7:57 am
Criminal law — Stetted case — Collateral order doctrine This appeal arises from an order granting the State’s motion to reopen a stetted case in the Circuit Court for Baltimore […] [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 10:23 am
The State […] [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 5:21 am
Criminal law — Motion to suppress — Probable cause In February 2023, the State charged Appellant, Rayshawn Monte Wallace (“Wallace”), in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County with several […] [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am
Late last week the United States Supreme Court decided Flowers v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:23 pm
S., at 165–168; see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 2:27 am
Successor to polluter not liable under later law Regina (National Grid Gas plc) v Environment Agency House of Lords “A private company which had succeeded the state-owned British Gas in 1986 was not liable under legislation enacted in 1995 for the cost of removing contamination from land at a former gasworks which had been sold for housing in 1965. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:49 am
Horsham Properties Group Ltd v Clark and another (Secretary of State for Justice intervening) [2008] EWHC 2327 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 307 “The exercise of a statutory power of sale under s 101 of the Law of Property Act 1925 after a relevant default by the mortgagor was not a deprivation of possessions within the meaning of art 1of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:29 am
In what looked like an impossible hurdle to climb, the law firm of Grabel and Associates shocked the state of Michigan by winning their second decision before the Michigan Supreme Court in less than a 3-week time span when the highest court of the state overturned the “People v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In the 2013 case of Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:16 am
(it’s generally the state where the employee works, not necessarily where the employer is based, that decides what state laws apply.) [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:58 am
A few highlights: Campbell v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:58 am
Does v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:46 am
But agency-deference doctrines under state law tend to be less systematic than under federal law. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:45 am
NAACP v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Jerry KangForgotten Lessons on Race, Law, and Marriage: The Story of Perez v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
