Search for: "London v. State" Results 1641 - 1660 of 3,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 12:22 pm
Petersburg Times of Tampa Bay predicts that a ruling in favor of the state in Florida v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Robin Callender Smith is Professor of Media Law at the Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary, University of London. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The next Data Protection Foundation Course is in London, and starts on the 9-11 May (3 days); full details available here. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:15 am by Vassilis Mavrakis
Background The M/V Majesty was carrying 25,000 mt of rice under a voyage charterparty on an amended Synacomex 90 form. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
IALS, London 22 June 2012, 10.30am-1pm: Changing the face of freedom, Free Word Centre, London. 28 June 2012, all day, LexisNexis Defamation & Privacy conference, London. 1-27 August, 5pm, Comedy: ‘One Rogue Reporter‘, Rich Peppiatt / Something for the Weekend, Edinburgh Festival. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 4:03 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On 9 July, Clark was appointed Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for AI and Digital Government at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
The AmeriKat's fantasy Brazilian island retreat,complete with patent decisions to keep oneoccupiedYet another gray, bleak Friday afternoon in London. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 11:48 am by Giles Peaker
  The appellants would have been better advised to state the facts relevant to their occupation of the property in their own words and to explain what they knew of the others who were not going to be called to give evidence. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
: The art and politics of a rupture (2016), London, Palgrave McMillian, Nash C. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
    Swap the non-distinctive words and add a house mark: not enough to avoid conflictWEALTHSMART v UBS SMARTWEALTH O/094/18 UK opposition (February 2018)For those involved in brand clearance, this is an illustration of the state of the Thomson Life principle in action before the UKIPO. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:53 am
Mr Heffernan was the freehold owner of 16 Penhurst Road, London, E9 (”the property”). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm by NL
He considers that five authorities: Warner v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm by NL
He considers that five authorities: Warner v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am by INFORRM
There should be some form of back stop power, vested in another body and, given that body needs sufficient powers to demand compliance, it will, regrettably have to be one regulated by the state. [read post]