Search for: "MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT" Results 1641 - 1660 of 4,507
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am by Heidi A. Nadel
On April 5, 2016, the Supreme Judicial Court heard argument in The Shrine of Our Lady of LaSalette v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am by Heidi A. Nadel
On April 5, 2016, the Supreme Judicial Court heard argument in The Shrine of Our Lady of LaSalette v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am by Heidi A. Nadel
On April 5, 2016, the Supreme Judicial Court heard argument inThe Shrine of Our Lady of LaSalette v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:23 am by David Rangaviz
” The ACLU recently gave the same treatment to a decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court – “State High Court Sends a Clear Message: Black Lives Do Matter. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In a new case from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Partanen v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 8:08 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
However, as your Boston personal injury attorney can explain, in Massachusetts, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) did away with these old distinctions in the 1970’s and now there is a standard of care that is the same as the one applied in most other personal injury cases, regardless of the reason that the plaintiff is on the defendant’s property. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:04 am by Patrick J. Murphy, Esq.
Neary-French, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court considered whether the 2003 amendment to M.G.L. chapter 90 section 24, which created a theory whereby a breath test reading .08 or more is an element of the offense, made the decision of whether to take a Breathalyzer a critical stage, such that the defendant needed to be advised of the right to counsel. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:04 am by Patrick J. Murphy, Esq.
Neary-French, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court considered whether the 2003 amendment to M.G.L. chapter 90 section 24, which created a theory whereby a breath test reading .08 or more is an element of the offense, made the decision of whether to take a Breathalyzer a critical stage, such that the defendant needed to be advised of the right to counsel. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:08 am by John H Curley
Duxbury Public Schools, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has rejected an effort to have the country recognize a "union member - union privilege,"  at least beyond the labor dispute setting. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:26 am by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
As the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has previously written, the system of recordkeeping for restraining order is “designed to promote the goal of preventing abuse . . . by providing a judge (and other authorized agencies) with complete information about a defendant . . . [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 6:47 am by Tom Smith
A ranking public official in Massachusetts is coming under fire for grilling a judicial nominee about his Catholic faith. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:27 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently decided an easement dispute involving a nature preserve and a neighboring landowner in Taylor v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:27 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently decided an easement dispute involving a nature preserve and a neighboring landowner in Taylor v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 6:42 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has disbarred an attorney convicted of criminal offenses and disbarred in New Hampshire. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 10:25 am by Daniel Cappetta
The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued two decisions – Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
L. c. 150E, but argued instead that the Massachusetts Supreme Court should interpret the statute as implying a union member-union privilege to secure the collective bargaining rights inherent in the statute. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:01 am by Steven Wildberger
[JURIST] The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court [official website] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] that same-sex couples that never marry are entitled to the same parental rights as heterosexual couples. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 9:32 am
" You can access today's ruling of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts at this link. [read post]