Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 1641 - 1660 of 5,962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm by Bobby Chen
” President Donald Trump tweeted that the United States would be imposing a 10 percent tariff on $300 billion of Chinese goods beginning in September. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Most people fixate on the first element of legal malpractice – departure from good practice. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 12:12 pm by Dave Ratner
Words and marks previously thought too scandalous or vulgar for registration may now be granted protection under the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:58 pm
Furthermore, by considering that the mere juxtaposition of colours was not sufficient to constitute a precise and uniform graphic representation, the General Court had failed to consider that a trade mark must be viewed as filed, as per the CJEU decision in Apple (C‑421/13). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
Enjoy this new edition of Never Too Late, summarising news and opinions provided by our Kats on the latest developments in IP law at the judicial, administrative, national, and European levels.Trade marksNedim Malovic discusses the difficulties for relevant authorities in the assessment of trade mark applications made by social media influencers and musicians aimed at creating a bridge with contemporary trends within the pop and cultural scenes.Tian Lu reports that Chanel Co., Ltd.… [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:00 am
In a recently published case (C-668/17 not yet available in English at the time of writing), the EU Court of Justice answers the question in the negative. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 12:20 pm by Vishnu Kannan
” The committee will call Mark Morgan, acting commissioner of U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  The website, Exaro, and its editor in chief Mark Watts have come in for particular criticism over the affair. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:36 pm by James Yang
  The following link explains at least two very good reasons for maintaining patent pending of the invention. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
(c) Evaluation Stage: Looking at the differences between these two forms, has there been an alteration of the “distinctive character” of the form of the registered mark? [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
GAME has a trademark registration for an image of the duck for various goods, and a copyright registration for the inflatable itself. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
In re National Association of Veterinary Technicians in America, Inc., Serial No. 87171093 (July 19, 2019) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 11:30 pm
(Scroll down below for exclusive video of THE BROWARD STRANGLER ( (c) Rumpole, 2019, all rights reserved)- a Broward Judge in action. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:15 am by SHG
The case marks the first time such an order has been enforced in a California court and possibly in any state court in the country. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
Trade marksIn Neymar scores at EU General Court: “Neymar” trade mark declared invalid due to bad faith registration, GuestKat Nedim Malovic analyses the application made for the word mark "Neymar"in class 25 as an EU trade mark by Mr Carlos Moreira.InternKat Antonella Gentile looks at the CJEU decision in Hansson, C-705/17 in The slow disappearance of disclaimers: the CJEU decision in Hansson, C-705/17. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:36 am
” Here, the Board held that the identified goods are illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and therefore any use of the marks in commerce would be unlawful. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 2:37 am
In re Outdoorlink, Inc., Serial Nos. 85935503 and 85935508 (July 8, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:26 am by Sara Parrello
The PRV justified its refusal saying to have changed its practice on geographical names following the Windsurfing Chiemsee judgment (C‑108/97 and C‑109/97), so that geographical names would only be considered descriptive when designating a place associable with the category of goods concerned. [read post]