Search for: "Matter of D." Results 1641 - 1660 of 52,864
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2019, 10:01 pm by Joe
W2s, W4s, 1099s, Schedule A, Schedule D – all of these things help better assess liability. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:02 am by John Jascob
Proposals focusing on significant D&O compensation matters that do not micromanage remain non-excludable. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 5:10 am
Lichter & Schwarz (a partnership) v Rubin [2008] EWHC 450 (Ch D); [2008] WLR (D) 93 “On an interim application for the disclosure of ‘information about relevant property or assets which are or may be the subject of an application for a freezing injunction’ pursuant to CPR r 25.1(1)(g), it was only necessary to show that a freezing order could be applied for and whether or not that application would be successful was not a matter on… [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:01 am by Geoffrey
   That is the logical implication of the judgment of the majority of the Supreme Court in the matter of Miller  ([2017] WLR(D) 53, [2017] UKSC 5). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:41 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On February 1st, 2012, the French supreme court for private and criminal matters (Cour de cassation) ruled that French courts had jurisdiction over a claim brought against FIFA (Fédération Internationale de Football Association) for anti competitive conduct. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:04 am
Back when I was a student, no matter how bad the previous year had been, I'd always welcome the new school year with hope and optimism. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:24 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Lead signatories on the brief included House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.); House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Representative John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.); the lead sponsors of the Respect for Marriage Act, Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.); and the co-chairs of the House LGBT… [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:36 am by Andrew Abramowitz
No matter the type of law firm that is taking the lead on a matter, it’s always appropriate to ensure that the subject matter experts are involved when needed. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:24 am by Valerie Katz
Hopefully some readers can (or have) recreate(d) your success. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:50 am by Mandelman
If you have never heard what Catherine has to say about our current crisis… well, you’d be insane not to take advantage of this opportunity. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:50 am by Mandelman
If you have never heard what Catherine has to say about our current crisis… well, you’d be insane not to take advantage of this opportunity. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 6:44 pm by Dave Hoffman
 There are tons of theories out there, and if we could test them, I doubt that we'd find law or legal rules to be a particularly dispositive part of the story. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:49 am by PaulKostro
“[RPC 1.9] provides straightforwardly that ‘[a] lawyer who has represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another client in the same or substantially related matter in which that client’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client[.] [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 7:12 am by Evan Holober and Geoffrey B. Fehling
The ruling shows that a “wrongful act” under a D&O policy need not be an egregious act of wrongdoing, that coverage may hinge on whether extrinsic evidence can establish coverage, and that breach of contract claims are not always uninsurable as a matter of law. [read post]