Search for: "Online Information Service, Inc."
Results 1641 - 1660
of 4,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2017, 5:32 pm
Honorable mentions: Aira App Aira is a smartphone app and paid subscription service that connects blind users to sighted agents who use geolocation information, streaming video, and other interconnected devices to provide guidance and information about the user’s surroundings. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
Google Inc. online: Inform’s Blog https://inforrm.wordpress.com/ 2014/02/05/case-law-hamburg-district-court-max-mosley-v-google-inc-google-go-down-again-this-time-in-hamburg-dominic-crossley/) and ECJ Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:19 am
Postal Service have their own rules and regulations outside of FAR and typical FAR supplements. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
However, the Bar found the donation and reward models to be potentially permissible.The Bar explained that the donation model, which may not be especially attractive to the attorneys given the online plat [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
* WIPO Roving SeminarThere is still time to reserve a place at the Italian Roving Seminar on WIPO services, which will take place in Bari on 5 July 2017. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:52 am
By the time I first met Tom Bruce, it was in my capacity as a token representative of the commercial side of the legal information world; I was an analyst at the research firm Outsell, Inc., which tracks various information markets, and I covered Thomson Reuters, Reed Elsevier (RELX), Wolters Kluwer, and all of the smaller players nipping at their heels in the legal information hierarchies of the time. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
Hunting World, Inc., F.2d 4, 9 n.6). [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 10:01 pm
He said the information he provided to ABC prior to their reports was not used by the network. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 10:01 pm
Consumers with questions can call Bulletproof’s customer service staff at 425-434-9704. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:18 am
Plaintiff alleges it owns a trade secret in its “methodology by which it inputs information into the Amazon search template in order to drive sales for its online tablet computer business. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am
Feb. 7, 2017) Devries v Experian Information Solutions, Inc 2017 WL 733096 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm
Coincidentally, Thomson Reuters released its analysis of the numbers of “reported” defamation cases – that is, the number of cases in which judgments have been given and reported on one of the online paid services. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
On 19 May 2017, the Federal Court gave leave to appeal in the case of Rana v Google Inc ([2017] FCA 542). [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm
On 19 May 2017, the Federal Court gave leave to appeal in the case of Rana v Google Inc ([2017] FCA 542). [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
” [13]This standard allows the Commission to prohibit practices that it determines unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage the ability of consumers to reach the Internet content, services, and applications of their choosing or of online content, applications, and service providers to access consumers. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
” [13]This standard allows the Commission to prohibit practices that it determines unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage the ability of consumers to reach the Internet content, services, and applications of their choosing or of online content, applications, and service providers to access consumers. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:37 am
Ordinary Ohioans, such as the plaintiffs (who are politically active online but who are not “employed or contracted by a newspaper, magazine, press association, news agency, news wire service, cable channel or cable operator, or radio or television station”), should have the same right as media members to engage in such speech. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:17 am
J.L., parents K.A. and K.I.A. instituted suit to enjoin J.L. from: 1) calling himself the father of their son, Z.A., 2) from contacting them and the child, and 3) to compel J.L. to remove information about Z.A. that he had published online. [read post]
16 May 2017, 5:47 am
The plaintiff’s commenced an action to enjoin J.L. from holding Z.A. out as his son, to enjoin him from contacting them and Z.A., and to compel J.L. to remove information pertaining to Z.A. that he allegedly published online. [read post]
