Search for: "Orin Kerr"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 3,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr conducted an impromptu survey about whether readers knew that cellphones transmitted locations to cellsite in order to know where to send calls. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:08 am
(Orin Kerr) Some recent litigation has raised an interesting question about how many people know the basics of how cell phones work. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:04 am
(Orin Kerr) Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal has a very interesting article on the dispute among two plaintiff’s attorneys involved in Florence v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:21 pm
(Orin Kerr) Back in August, I had a long post, Fourth Amendment Stunner: Judge Rules That Cell-Site Data Protected By Fourth Amendment Warrant Requirement, about a recent Fourth Amendment decision by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 10:20 am
(Orin Kerr) Over at Slate, law professor Mark McKenna has a courageous essay on the abuse allegations at Penn State — and how they have encouraged him to speak out for the first time about his own victimization. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:05 am
Both Marty and Orin Kerr have been involved in a valuable exchange of posts about the legality of the NSA's surveillance programs reported by ABC News. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) From the January 1964 issue of the Harvard Law Review, a review by Judge Henry Friendly of a new book on legal issues raised by aviation, titled “Air Law,” by NYU Law Professor DeForest Billyou:A reviewer of this book must begin by asking what purpose it was intended to serve. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
(Orin Kerr) I was at the Supreme Court this morning for oral argument in City of Ontario v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:24 pm
(Orin Kerr) You can read it here. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:48 pm
I’m under an edit deadline right now, but Orin Kerr’s post over at Volokh Conspiracy on the Verizon FISA order contains this fascinating bit: If the order is what it appears to be, then the order points to a problem in Section 1861 that has not been appreciated. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 6:30 pm
In addition to Lyrissa Lidsky's wonderful post and the interesting comments here on prawfs, Michael Froomkin blogs on the release of first semester grades here and Orin Kerr provides a very thoughtful post here. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
(Orin Kerr) My co-blogger David Post has authored several passionate posts harshly criticizing the federal government’s recent practice of seizing domain names pursuant to ex parte court orders based on probable cause. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:23 am
(Orin Kerr) In their posts below, both Jonathan Adler and Randy Barnett suggest that it’s okay for the proposed activity/inactivity distinction to be unclear because the “actus reus” distinction has been unclear for a long time and the world hasn’t ended. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 11:05 am
(Orin Kerr) A decade ago, I spent a lot of time debunking misunderstandings of the USA Patriot Act. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) Having read Judge Reinhardt’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:14 am
(Orin Kerr) In today’s argument, Chief Justice Roberts had an interesting series of questions on a matter that we debated a bit here at the blog: If the penalties for violating the individual mandate are really weak, is the regulation really a “mandate”? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:46 am
(Orin Kerr) According to this morning’s order list, the Supreme Court has agreed to review United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:34 pm
(Ilya Somin) Co-blogger Orin Kerr comments on the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision holding that a Los Angeles policy allowing the seizure of briefly unattended property belonging to the homeless violates the Fourth Amendment’s ban on “unreasonable” seizures. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:22 pm
by Kenneth Anderson H/T to Orin Kerr for pointing this out, but this week is national pro bono week. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
Orin Kerr points us to an article at law.com:In a pact brokered by the New York County Lawyers’ Association, more than 60 law firms have agreed to tell their corporate clients the composition of assigned legal teams by race, gender, ethnicity and sexual preference.For several years, clients have asked law firms to sign statements in support of diversifying the legal profession. [read post]
