Search for: "P Plaintiff"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 13,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2020, 7:59 pm
Plaintiffs caused most of the damages because, in the six years since the 2013 Storms, Plaintiffs performed almost no repairs. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
The case was assigned to District Judge Philip P. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:22 pm
First, it held that the manner in which the defendant converted the plaintiff’s property “did matter” because “[p]unitive damages may properly be awarded in an action for conversion where the act of the defendant is accompanied with fraud, ill will, recklessness, wantonness, oppressiveness, willful disregard of the plaintiff’s rights, or other circumstances tending to aggravate the injury. [read post]
3 May 2018, 6:22 am
The case was assigned to Judge Tanya Walton Pratt and Magistrate Judge Matthew P. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 10:29 am
P. 37(e) in declining to impose sanctions. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
P. 30(d)(3) motion. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:09 pm
Plaintiff entered premature labor and the procedure was performed in an emergency, but Plaintiff suffered significant complications. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:51 am
In that case, the plaintiff pension fund had made claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, alleging that S&P’s Ratings Services had intentionally made false and misleading statements to investors about the accuracy of its credit ratings for mortgage-backed securities. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:53 am
The original lead plaintiff in the case, first filed in 2015, was a 60-something man named Robert Heath who says he was deemed a "great candidate" by a Google recruiter. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:04 pm
Enlarge (credit: Getty Images | NurPhoto) Tesla today defeated a lawsuit that claimed its Autopilot technology caused a car crash that left the plaintiff with severe injuries. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:44 am
The trial court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the class action, this time without leave to amend; in part, the trial court concluded that “[p]laintiffs have not shown they were personally damaged or that the allegedly unconscionable or illegal provisions have been enforced against them. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 am
P. 11.03(b),” and that there was no error with the trial court doing so here. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:44 am
According to Plaintiff, the "intellectual core" of Middlebury College's Accelerationism Research Consortium ("ARC") is "derived exclusively from the [P]laintiff's labor," yet she was excluded from the venture because of her disabilities. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
Defendants argue that certain allegations in the complaint fall within the ambit of section 502(a) of ERISA because plaintiffs, as plan participants, allege the broker defendants breached their fiduciary duties by failing to properly administer the ESOP. . . . [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
See Op. at p. 16. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 5:01 am
P. 9(b) and the PLSRA, plaintiffs must plead with particularity the facts giving rise to a material misrepresentation or misleading omission and explain why it is misleading. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 2:05 pm
Plaintiffs won in 56% of trials overall. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:29 am
P. 37.Galvin contends the supplemental affidavits do not contradict but merely clarify the affiants' prior statements. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Judge Alonso denied plaintiff Viahart’s Fed. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:47 am
P. 11 motion for sanctions in this patent case. [read post]
