Search for: "People v Catchings"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 1,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
Alas, the decision in People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 7:24 am
The one in Texas [BarTex Research LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:11 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:16 pm
Al Franken finds himself one of only five non-lawyers on the committee, in his role as the "people's proxy," according to the Minneapolis Star Tribune. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:40 am
I didn't catch all of the ravings and lunacy. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 10:50 am
Would the gods let Marv catch it or wouldn't they? [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
The California Supreme Court has ruled that breath tests don't always mean someone is intoxicated even if the result is above the legal limit of .08, People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 7:59 am
But they didn't catch him. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:49 am
OCC has been trying to catch up, because regulated industry prefers to deal with only one federal regulator, as opposed to 51. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
V. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 7:02 am
In that case, State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
The Indiana Secretary of State filed a complaint against Aaron V. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Pereira v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
When a foul ball was hit toward the bench he was managing from, Kelly quickly shouted "Kelly now catching for Boston," thus making himself the team's catcher (under baseball's rules at the time) and made the catch and the out. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:02 pm
In its opinion, the court noted that under People v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 11:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:14 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
