Search for: "People v Peters"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
This court in People's Union for Democratic Rights & Others v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:34 am
A recent post at Time.com discussed how the US v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:34 am
Peter Singer)This is not, I think, chiefly a complaint about people’s refusal to judge behavior in foreign countries. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 9:48 am
It's Case T-437/09 Oyster Cosmetics SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kadabell GmbH & Co. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm
If time allows, the Program Committee will review papers by other people for possible presentation at the workshop. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:38 pm
Supreme Court justices have always struck me as extremely busy people. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:27 am
Most seriously, he totally botches the description of an extremely important recent case, Chaoulli v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
When she was a fresh kitten, the radios were booming with Madonna, Queen, Beastie Boys and Peter Gabriel and movie theaters were welcoming audiences to watch Top Gun, Pretty in Pink and Aliens. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Peter Hall, Holly Doremus, Bradford C. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
On January 4, 2011–-the day of Judge Weill's investiture—Eaton Corporation moved to have Judge Weill recuse himself from the Eaton v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 pm
The authors criticise the recent ECJ judgment in Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
Thus, prudent businesses and business people will undertake a separate risk assessment to determine what additional steps to take before the Bill becomes law. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Thermo-Ply, Inc (Patently-O) 7th Circuit rejects Zippo sliding scale for personal jurisdiction: Poulsen Roser A/S v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm
Hat Tip to fellow tweeter @Taxbod for drawing attention to this classic from Peter Cook…. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
(Props to Tom Colby and Peter Smith for a longer discussion of this inconsistency in their academic work.) [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 4:12 pm
SCOTUS seems to rely exclusively on the idea of lenity, as in Weyhrauch v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Case law The Spencer v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm
I discussed it at length when the Supremes decided Caperton v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
