Search for: "People v. House" Results 1641 - 1660 of 11,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
  Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:15 am by Will Baude
  And while a lot of people have written things about Maryland v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:22 am by James Romoser
New York, a high-profile dispute over the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people who are living in the country illegally from the census-based population counts that are used to reapportion seats in the House of Representatives. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:14 pm by Venkat
Several courts have said as much in the defamation context (see DiMeo v Max, Finkel v Dauber, and more recently, Sandals Resorts v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 11:35 pm
Two people who rode in the Chevrolet suffered moderate to minor injuries: Land, 45, and Marilyn V. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:56 pm
 When the Bush tax cuts were enacted in 2001 (and to some extent in 2003), many people thought that the sunset provision was a gimmick designed to limit the accounting damage from deeming the cuts permanent (at least in the sense that any legislation can be permanent, which is to say that it remains in effect until repealed). [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 5:28 am by Dave
  It’s not a housing case, but it is worth repeating what was said by the President of the Divisional Court because it underlines the significance of the new N463 and out of hours form:7. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
[The namesake of Obamacare took a victory lap at the White House.] [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 7:29 pm
Virginia, 2002) and minors (Roper v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm by Daniel Reid
 The Court noted that financial problems were the most common motives alleged and accepted for people to commit arson of their own property, citing Abmrus v. [read post]