Search for: "People v. House"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 11,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2007, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 1:48 pm
(See, e.g., Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:59 am
In any event, the limitation upon the President’s appointment power is there not for the benefit of the Senate, but for the protection of the people; it should not be dependent on Senate action for its existence. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 5:44 am
” This is in conflict with Roe v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
The House of Representatives is reading the Constitution this morning. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:30 am
The less people spend, the smaller V, money velocity, becomes. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 1:10 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:50 pm
In State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
1 May 2014, 2:07 pm
Boston Housing Authority, it is important to know the time line. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
And while a lot of people have written things about Maryland v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:46 pm
In City of Dallas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:27 pm
Wade and which the House of Representatives passed last year. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 7:19 am
Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Lange v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:28 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:14 pm
Several courts have said as much in the defamation context (see DiMeo v Max, Finkel v Dauber, and more recently, Sandals Resorts v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:22 am
New York, a high-profile dispute over the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people who are living in the country illegally from the census-based population counts that are used to reapportion seats in the House of Representatives. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
It’s not a housing case, but it is worth repeating what was said by the President of the Divisional Court because it underlines the significance of the new N463 and out of hours form:7. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:56 pm
When the Bush tax cuts were enacted in 2001 (and to some extent in 2003), many people thought that the sunset provision was a gimmick designed to limit the accounting damage from deeming the cuts permanent (at least in the sense that any legislation can be permanent, which is to say that it remains in effect until repealed). [read post]
