Search for: "People v. Modell"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 4,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm
Played that role even before Folsom v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Results such as the recent Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 11:31 am
That same year, nearly 700 people were killed in drunk driving wrecks. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:42 pm
Supreme Court decision in MGM v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 9:47 pm
The people who head Penn and Yale's progams may be terrific, but there's only so much one person can do. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:14 am
Justice is extant; equality advances incrementally through the work of people. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
State of Georgia v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:08 am
A similar situation in Philadelphia last year resulted in the district attorney offering new trials to nearly 1,500 people who had been convicted of driving under the influence over the previous 15 months. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 12:32 am
You can't blame V. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 1:12 pm
Apple said sanctioning an iPhone operating system hack would gut its business model. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:54 am
Gates v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am
An introduction to the model indictment is provided by James A. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Clark Holdings Ltd. v HOOPP Realty Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:17 pm
The Court of Appeals, in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:34 pm
Network models are another approach. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:18 am
The first is that people who are provoked by words that they find exceptionally painful, and who react to the infliction of verbal pain by killing, are weak people -- people acting out of a kind of akrasia. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Rogers v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:35 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:35 pm
-------------------*Here's Stevens, from Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir explaining how he concluded that the death penalty is now unconstitutional - a conclusion he stated in Baze v. [read post]
