Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 72,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 12:05 pm
Today's holding by the Court of Appeal holds that a "house car" by any other name still qualifies as a castle. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:30 pm
Maybe the jury would have sentenced you to death anyway. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
If you want a detailed description into the seedy underbelly of Oakland, take a look at this.It's like a movie. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 11:21 am
It's no defense to a statute that imposes a sentence of 15-to-life for raping someone during a kidnapping that when you initially kidnapped them, you originally intended to murder them, and only thereafter decided to rape them instead.Just proving that common sense -- and straightforward statutory interpretation -- sometimes prevails. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 10:38 am
Here's an opinion by Justice Suzukawa, who's fairly new to the Court of Appeal (he's been there for a little less than a year). [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:21 pm
You were ordered committed -- in an ostensibly civil proceeding -- to a state hospital for a year based upon your then-existing psychiatric state. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:50 pm
I'm far from the most tech-savvy person in the universe. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:44 pm
It's not the usual death penalty case where the defendant forthrightly admits to killing the victim. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
What counts as "immediate"? [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 1:26 pm
One of the downsides to selling drugs to gang members in the area is that they occasionally shoot both you and your wife in the face while robbing your home. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 1:27 pm
"There is nothing like a short stint of self-representation to dampen the hubris of a defendant who may not truly appreciate the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation when advised of them as part of a Faretta waiver. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 3:29 pm
Justice Cornell writes a concurring opinion in this case to try to be helpful to trial courts in confronting the challenges involved when a criminal pro per defendant may potentially be disruptive.Let me add another one:Chill out. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:23 pm
As my kids would say, the defendant in this case really "Took the L" on appeal.He's convicted of possessing a tiny amount of marijuana in prison (.4 grams), and gets sentenced to a little under three years in prison as a result. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:22 pm
The theme for today's opinions from the California Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit may revolve around the duality of man.Take Daniel Landry. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
It's not as if I don't understand the theory. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 1:01 pm
Law students often find constitutional law interesting, but somewhat challenging. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
There's virtually no physical evidence at all. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 2:31 pm
One of my (many) flaws as a writer is that I often craft overly long sentences, full of semicolons, dependent clauses, unnecessary adjectives, etc. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
"Yeah, apparently, the feds are soft on kiddie porn. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:09 am
Here's how you get 15 years in prison for your first DUI arrest notwithstanding having no criminal history.Appropriately. [read post]
