Search for: "Plante v. Plante"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 5,902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2008, 6:47 pm
The brief, filed in U.S. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 7:11 am
P. 26(b)(1); Lowd v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:47 am
Dev., et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:14 am
While delegated State EPAs handle most of the permitting for new factories or plant expansions, EPA plays a critical role in reviewing draft permits. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:39 am
AMP v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:29 am
The federal Clean Air Act requires the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“Administrator” or “EPA”) to promulgate modern pollution control limits at the massive Navajo Generating Station (“NGS”) and Four Corners Power Plant (“Four Corners”), located on Navajo tribal lands in Arizona and New Mexico, to remedy unhealthful, scenery-impairing air pollution in protected national parks and wilderness areas in the… [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:48 pm
For a more detailed analysis of using nuisance to successfully sue major emitters of greenhouse gases, Connecticut v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:16 am
The letter offers up several arguments regarding why the Clean Air Act (CAA), under Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:42 am
Here at C&C, we will be focused on Glossip v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 9:35 am
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am
This will have a direct impact of the decision on Ed Sheeran "Let's Get it On" v "Thinking Out Loud" case [Katpost here], where Sheeran's lawyers argued that the Let's Get It On deposit defines the scope of protection, but Townsend's team argued that the composition is embodied on the Gaye recording. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm
As I’m sure you all know, the Lacey Act of 1900 prohibits any sort of trading in protected fish, wildlife, or plants. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada The CourtValid and Operative Division of Powers: Murray‑Hall v Quebec (Attorney General) In Murray‑Hall v Quebec (Attorney General), 2023 SCC 10 [Murray-Hall], a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) held that Quebec legislation prohibiting possession of cannabis plants for personal cultivation or use can coexist with a federal law permitting possession up to four plants. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 10:13 am
The Appeals Court's recent decision in Conservation Commission of Brockton v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:46 am
., LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
In American Lung Association v. [read post]
