Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 55,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2009, 10:47 am
Electric Power Company v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:03 am
v=MnwI4m4KOlo Powerful new Mini-Documentary from Masterpeace [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:20 am
The Court's order in Azar v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
United States, Justice Kennedy identified the two purposes of separation of powers (this passage was repeated by Chief Justice Roberts in Stern v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 10:25 am
S and Marper v United Kingdom (Application Nos 30562/04 and 30566/04) European Court of Human Rights “The blanket and indiscriminate nature of the powers of retention of fingerprints, cellular samples and DNA profiles of persons suspected but not convicted of offences failed to strike a fair balance between the competing public and private interests. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 12:31 pm
In arriving at this order, the Court barely acknowledges the pathmarking decision in Griggs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:56 am
BCL Old Co Ltd and others v BASF SE (formerly BASF AG) and others (No 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 1258; [2010] WLR (D) 290 “There was no power under the Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2003 to extend time for bringing proceedings for follow-on damages under the Competition Act 1998. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:39 am
Regina (Corner House Research and Another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The rule of law required that an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office into bribery and corruption should be discontinued only by the independent judgment of the director of that office and not in response to a threat by a foreign power. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:33 am
Regina (George Wimpey UK Ltd) v Tewkesbury Borough Council Court of Appeal “The Court of Appeal had power to grant permission to appeal to a party who had not been in the case at first instance. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:17 am
R (Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council [2009] EWCA Civ 734; [2009] WLR (D) 278 “S 226(1A) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 did not prevent a planning authority, when considering the exercise of its compulsory purchase powers, from having regard to wider benefits resulting from the development, redevelopment or improvement of or [...] [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:28 am
Masri v Consolidated Contractors International UK Ltd and Others (No 2) Court of Appeal “The court had the power to appoint a receiver by way of equitable execution over future receipts from a defined asset. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:40 am
R (Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council [2010] UKSC 20; [2010] WLR (D) 123 “A planning authority, in considering the exercise of its compulsory purchase powers in relation to one site, was not entitled to take into account a commitment by a developer to secure the redevelopment of another unconnected site. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:09 am
Regina (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Inner West London [2010] EWHC 3098 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 305 “A coroner did not have power to receive sensitive evidence relating to the security service in a closed hearing in the absence of properly interested persons and their legal representatives. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm
We know all too well from California v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 9:30 pm
” This famous passage in McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:23 pm
Metamorphosis Salon v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
In his dissent in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
Power-One v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:59 pm
Cir. 2024)Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:46 am
In Hammerschlag v. [read post]
