Search for: "R. Held, et al. v. State, et al." Results 1641 - 1660 of 1,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
In light of the Supreme Court decision this week in Kimbrough v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
” Appellants [Judith Miller et al.] argue that “this proposition of law is flatly contrary to the great weight of authority in this and other circuits. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
A lawyer who commences a sexual relationship necessarily creates “a substantial risk that the lawyer’s representation of the client would be materially and adversely affected” [emphasis added] (FLS Model Code, Rule 3.4-1, Comm’y 2 – also R v Neil 2002 SCC 70 et al). [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas & Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly – four strategic… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:01 am by Anthony J. Vecchio
Omnibuses as classified by R.S.39:3-10.1 and school buses classified under N.J.S.18A:39-1 et seq. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
  This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:25 am by Jeralyn
The case is [2012] NZHC 2076 - The United States of America v Dotcom & Ors. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Fiona de Londras
This past week we’ve seen the difficulties associated with using private companies and making these companies accountable come into sharp relief in the United States with the latest installation in the case of Mohammed et al v Jeppesen Dataplan. [read post]