Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Cruise ships generally transport passengers between ports in the United States and foreign countries. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:31 pm
Royal Indem. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:13 am
Royal's safety guidelines for the Flowrider attraction clearly state that only the surfing boards can be stood upon, while the body boards should only be used while lying down. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:11 am
United States, and its two Eighth Amendment juvenile life-without-parole cases, Miller v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm
Related posts: New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed United States Supreme Court to Again Consider the Alien Tort Statute US Supreme Court Grants Review in Case Involving Whether US Securities Laws Apply to Transnational Dealings [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:03 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
Supreme Court Gnango, R. v [2011] UKSC 59 (14 December 2011) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor [2011] UKSC 60 (14 December 2011) Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 58 (14 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Revenue And Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership [2011] EWCA Civ 1578 (20 December 2011) Ablyazov & Ors v JSC BTA Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 1588 (20… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
Brainy law The Royal Society has published a report entitled “Brain Waves 4: Neuroscience and the Law”. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
Holder and Hardy v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Milton Keynes Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 1575 (16 December 2011) Terluk v Berezovsky [2011] EWCA Civ 1534 (15 December 2011) Banks v Morgan & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1568 (15 December 2011) Liberty Insurance PTE Ltd & Anor v Argo Systems FZE [2011] EWCA Civ 1572 (15 December 2011) Titshall v Qwerty Travel Ltd [2011]… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
In Dugal v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy Orin Kerr weighs in on some of the Chief Justice’s questions during last month’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:31 am
As Judge Clifford Bellamy stated, the 'proverbial man on the Clapham omnibus' may be surprised to learn that a parent who has murdered the other parent should nonetheless be entitled to make an application for contact with his child, but there is of course no presumption in law that murder would be a bar to contact.On a lighter note, I was pleased to report on the 16th of March the marketing of my favourite memento of the forthcoming royal wedding, also known as… [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:50 am
” According to Sosa v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:41 am
" According to Sosa v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
At the age of 18 the appellant had volunteered for the Royal Navy and under its auspices was posted to submarines as Leading Medical Assistant. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
On Wednesday 14 December 2011 the Supreme Court will hand down the following judgments: R v Gnango, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne and anor and the linked appeals of Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Botham v Ministry of Defence. [read post]
