Search for: "Roman v. Roman" Results 1641 - 1660 of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Roman Anin, co-founder of iStories, previously journalist at Novaya Gazeta. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
” The Justices weren’t much more hospitable to Assistant to the Solicitor General Roman Martinez, arguing on behalf of the federal government. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
 That, in fact, is the very heart of what the Court did last year in its one fully considered ruling in this series — the decision in Burwell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:28 pm
Feel free to send us an email at hull.lawyers@gmail.com or leave us a comment on the Hull on Estates blog. st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan;… [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
Paul’s letter to the Romans, where the author observes the strange and decidedly non-rational phenomenon of doing what he hates, rather than what he wants, along with some befuddlement as to why this happens.[13] Christianity is well aware humans are often guided more by sub-conscious adaptations and mental shortcuts than by objective analysis and rational choice.[14]  The “ego is the enemy” as one author put it.[15]  Which is to say, importantly, that the person… [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:30 am by GuestPost
Initially the default setting on matters of ethical controversy such as abortion for example was the naturalist approach of Roman Catholic theology which coincided with a cultural attachment to patriarchy. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]