Search for: "SIMON v. STATE"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 1,739
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2008, 11:50 am
My thanks to Kenneth Simons for his comments.) [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:34 am
The case is titled Guru Denim, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:02 am
Simon Tanner, Reproduction Charging Models & Rights Policy for Digital Images in American Art Museums (a Mellon Foundation study) This was part of the background materials for the Corel v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:57 am
An opinion issued yesterday in the case of Cheryl Janky v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:53 pm
Mandy writes: The case, Rahman v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:02 pm
[v] The U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
The Underexplored Linkage Between Human Resource Strategies and Firm-Specific Capital Andrew von Nordenflycht, Professor, Segal Graduate School of Business, Simon Fraser University, The Demise of Professional Partnership? [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 7:27 am
Id. at *5-6.In Simon v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
Mr Justice Simons held that the Allocation Scheme was defective in relation to the making of social services nominations. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:44 pm
Simon of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:13 pm
Thorpe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:00 pm
In its 2005 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
(State Farm, supra, 538 U.S. at p. 419; Simon, supra, 35 Cal.4th at p. 1180.) [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
The state judiciary rejected these arguments, Hill v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 8:10 pm
Most surveys of these three sentencing eras have focused on the changing power of the judge: from unfettered discretion before the Sentencing Guidelines, to severely restricted discretion under the mandatory guidelines, to our current system of guided discretion under United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:43 pm
A CAAF grant in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 12:55 pm
There are many issues raised by the LG v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 5:13 pm
Simon v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 5:03 am
Simon v. [read post]