Search for: "STATE v BRADY"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 1,723
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2008, 6:46 am
Jackson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Bornhorst, No. 06-3729 "In a suit raising claims under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, and for state law malicious prosecution, defamation, and tortious interference with a prospective contract, summary judgment for defendants on all claims is reversed in part where: 1) plaintiff's arrest for murder was unsupported by probable cause, and thus defendant-prosecutor was not entitled to qualified immunity; 2) the district court erred in… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:28 am
Supreme Court, January 16, 2008 "New York State Bd. of Elections v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
§ 1983, and for malicious prosecution, defamation, and tortious interference with a prospective contract, pursuant to Ohio state law. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 7:59 am
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, et al. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
Hackman v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 3:47 am
The district court denied Bell's petition but issued a certificate of appealability as to Bell's claims that the prosecution in his case violated Brady v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
United States, 858 F .2d 416 (8th Cir.1988) (same); Miller v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:03 pm
Briar et al v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:29 am
Case Name: Wilkening v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:29 am
Case Name: Wilkening v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 8:36 pm
" Applying United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 11:17 am
" Two years later, Printz v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:00 pm
A recent SDNY decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
Nevertheless, if the prosecutor knows that any witnesses have exculpatory information, the prosecutor must disclose the witnesses' identifying information under Brady v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:42 am
(That is not a reason to think that Brown was a mistake: it is simply a consequence of how judicial protection of controversial rights claims usually works in the United States.).Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:44 pm
Gun Case
Legal Times
The Supreme Court announced Tuesday it will take up the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
"He disagreed with the appeals court ruling last March in the Parker v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
Specifically, Garner contends that the district courterred in denying his motion for a new trial based on a violation of Brady v. [read post]
