Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 122,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2024, 2:54 am
Ergul said in his plea agreement that in June 2022 – following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 12:32 am
If Buckley v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
(For more on the original dispute, see R.J. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm
And in cert denial news, we are sad that the Supreme Court will not take up Pollreis v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 10:44 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:28 am
In Absolute Healthcare v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:25 am
The O’Kroley v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:00 am
(Melendrez v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:38 am
(Note that there have been statements from some Supreme Court justices that suggest that this standard that arose in a case, NY Times v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am
In R v Gul, it noted “that insurgents in non-international armed conflicts do not enjoy combatant immunity” (para. 50). [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:29 am
United StatesLindke v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:07 am
See our live traffic map for updates. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:06 am
(Written submissions are linked below; but see also the verbatim records of the oral hearings at those case pages.) [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:00 am
In the case of Kosicki v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am
On May 20, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) filed applications for arrest warrants in the Situation in the State of Palestine. [read post]
31 May 2024, 4:30 am
On May 9, 2024, in the matter of Jason Kim v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 4:29 am
The two earlier decisions that the GC refers to rather served to explain why the weakness of the earlier marks did not avoid confusion (the CJEU’s decision in case C‑235/05 P on FLEX v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 3:10 am
Plaintiff’s claims against his union, Professional Staff Congress (PSC-CUNY), and its legal director, arising from their selection of an allegedly biased arbitrator are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel based on this Court’s resolution of that issue in plaintiff’s prior appeals (see Matter of Dowlah v City Univ. of N.Y., 189 AD3d 533, 534 [1st Dept 2020]; Dowlah v American Arbitration Assn., 221 AD3d 426, 426 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Hence, the plaintiff in McRitchie v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] See generally Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]