Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 1641 - 1660 of 5,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  The LMA terms do not provide the seller with the ability to determine the vesting of any right to payment which might later accrue. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
It should be born in mind that in L’Oréal v eBay the CJEU stated 3 things: “The fact that the service provided by the operator of an online marketplace includes the storage of information transmitted to it by its customer-sellers is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that that service falls, in all situations, within the scope of Article 14(1) of Directive 2000/31” (at [113]). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:28 pm by jordan
” The change was made to ensure that if “The seller agrees to a buyer’s offer that includes Rider V, the seller is now aware that the buyer’s offer is contingent on the buyer selling another property. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
Redbubble and others]….just because a seller is an online service does not mean they automatically escape liability…. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 11:10 am by Lincoln W. Hobbs, Esq., CCAL
”Turning to the review of “independent duties,” the Court rejected a request to extend the independent duty between a contractor-seller and a home purchaser to a similar duty between a contractor-seller and the Association. [read post]