Search for: "Stan"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 2,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2010, 7:31 am
Church made frequent complaints to upper management, including officers and managing agents such as Stan Brown, David Black, and Mary Smith, regarding the failure of Kaiser to address serious patient and staff safety issues. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
Lawrence III, The Id, the Ego, and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism, 39 Stan. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:09 am
© Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | 9 comments | Add to del.icio.us Post tags: [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:06 pm
REV. 41 (2007), Julie Cohen, Examined Lives: Informational Privacy and the Subject as Object, 52 STAN. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:22 am
© Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us Post tags: apple, ipad [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 5:05 am
Still to come: a ruling on punitive damages, a criminal trial, and the suit against Cincinnati attorney Stan Chesley, who's accused of the same wrongdoing. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:23 pm
Speaker(s): Catherine Monte - Fox Rothschild LLP, Kathrine Cain - Winston & Strawn LLP, Stan Wasylyk - Michael Farrell Group A request frequently made of KM or IS professionals in law firms is to implement a way to efficiently track and report the experience of individual attorneys. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
The South Park Elementary school boys—Cartman, Stan, Kyle and Butters—create a viral video in order to accrue enough “internet money” to buy off the striking Canadians. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 9:13 am
Stan Billingsly at LawReader also reports on the recent unpublished opinions that address the issue in Kentucky from an equitable estoppel argument. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 12:09 am
© Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us Post tags: [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 10:34 pm
© Stan for China Hearsay, 2012. | Permalink | 2 comments | Add to del.icio.us Post tags: data privacy [read post]
21 May 2020, 11:35 am
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:56 pm
See Four Models of Fourth Amendment Protection, 60 Stan. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:59 pm
-> New rule over residential power use in trial http://t.co/3DddiRRI from your friends at the NDRC -> Bloomberg: Heaven Help Us If The Rest Of China Crashes As Hard As Wenzhou http://t.co/Ey6h2aHs -> Caixin: Watching media watchdogs in China http://t.co/cKRY4C6C -> WSJ: The ‘Destabilizing Effects’ of China’s State-Owned Enterprises http://t.co/0YFOd6ww @joshchin -> Economist: America and the Asian giants: Spot the difference http://t.co/OuzzDtgH ->… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 10:30 am
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:52 am
. *** Local invitees to the White House meeting include: Lou Hollingsworth, Partner, Hollingsworth Kelly Stan Lubin, Member, American Constitution Society Judicial Nominations Task Force Nick Enoch, Member, American Constitution Society Judicial Nominations Task Force Patty Ferguson, National President, National Native American Bar Association They will join approximately 150 individuals from 27 states in a day of discussions with White House staff. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
This live, free webinar has been approved (or pending where noted) for one hour of continuing education (CE) credit for the following: CEU adjuster AK (pending), AL, AR, CA (WC), DE, FL, GA, ID (pending), IN, KY, LA, MN (pending), MS, MT (pending), NC, NH (WC & Multi), NM, OK (pending), OR (WC), TX, UT, WY CE for national nurse CCMC national When Tuesday, July 27, 2021 11:00 am – 12:00 pm PT (2:00 – 3:00 pm ET) Speakers Michael Choo, MD, FACEP, FAAEM… [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 9:06 am
For more information about this case, contact Stan Gibson at 310.201.3548 or SGibson@jmbm.com. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm
” Ford refers to a study done by Hans Zeisel & Shari Seidman Diamond, [The Effect of Peremptory Challenges on Jury and Verdict, 30 STAN. [read post]
