Search for: "Starks v State"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 1,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 7:21 am
However, these statements were not direct evidence of discrimination (EEOC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 9:11 am
In Zachary v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
In House v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
De LaRosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria for gang activity as defined inthe CDCR rules and regulations, as well as the standard set forth in the1994 case Castillo v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
But the report outlines a stark future for residents in these areas, including many in California. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
To demonstrate the stark difference between their publicness and exclusiveness, assets of public benefit organizations are distributed to other public benefit organizations when they are dissolved,[15] whereas the assets of closing clubs can go to the members of the entity. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
“[U]sers can easily create specific searches, including all Sherlock Holmes works posted in 2018 that are exactly 221 words long and Lord of The Rings/Game of Thrones crossovers that don't include either Frodo Baggins or Arya Stark. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:02 am
And on the international stage, they have adopted counterterrorism rhetoric to mobilize support or deflect criticism – accusing other States of making statements “in support of terrorism,” urging supporters of the pending ICJ case (South Africa v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a look at the circumstances at the company that led to this enforcement action and reviews the important lessons that can be learned from what happened. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:36 pm
John Maloof v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
I’ll bet that Secretary of State Raffensperger now appreciates why the Federal Court forced him to stop using those DRE machines (Curling v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm
In stark contrast to the Purdue saga, at least a dozen Insys employees were criminally prosecuted by the DOJ for Insys’ multiple criminal conspiracies to unlawfully flood the market with an extremely potent liquid fentanyl spray called Subsys. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 7:31 am
Supreme Court’s transformative ruling in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said yesterday. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:46 am
In Kane v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Case law The Spencer v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a look the recent regulatory developments and examines their implications. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
On December 14, in an open letter to then-President Trump, he presented a stark ultimatum, beseeching Trump to invoke martial law to prevent the transfer of presidential power to President-Elect Biden or force the Oath Keepers to take bloodier action on their own: CONCLUSION: WE ARE IN FOR A FIGHT NO MATTER WHAT. ... [read post]
