Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 12,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2018, 10:20 am
The 9th Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued an opinion recently in Goudelock v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:21 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 4:26 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in September 2024 that the plaintiffs established by a preponderance of the evidence that the levels of fluoride typical in drinking water in the United States pose an unreasonable risk of injury to the health of the public. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 4:26 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in September 2024 that the plaintiffs established by a preponderance of the evidence that the levels of fluoride typical in drinking water in the United States pose an unreasonable risk of injury to the health of the public. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
Arguing for California, Deputy Attorney General Robin Urbanski jumped right to the heart of the state’s position: Although the California Supreme Court did provide an “adjudication on the merits,” that adjudication was not its conclusion that the trial court violated Batson (and its California state law analogue); rather, it was its determination that any Batson error was “harmless. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:45 am
Additional Resources: California Farm Union Confronts DC Opposition, May 12, 2015, Daily Caller More Blog Entries: Arlington v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
United States; see my preview), the question presented in the second case (United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
In California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:36 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm
California and Indiana v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Reg. 63737, in 2009, the proposed infrastructure SIP was the subject of a 2012 lawsuit brought by the Sierra Club against EPA for failure of enforcement of the infrastructure SIP requirements, which lawsuit was stayed by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California as related to ongoing litigation in the United States Supreme Court, EME Homer City v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 2:34 pm
Yesterday, Federal Judge Edward Chen, of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, issued a preliminary injunction temporarily stopping the United States government from rescinding the temporary protected status designation for immigrants from Sudan, El Salvador, Haiti, and Nicaragua. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
(“WildTangent”), in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 5:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
