Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 29,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
Telecom Association v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:01 pm
By Dennis Crouch Gunn v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:14 am
See Martin v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
In furtherance of the Congress's stated policy, I have authorized a small number of combat-equipped U.S. forces to deploy to central Africa to provide assistance to regional forces that are working toward the removal of Joseph Kony from the battlefield.So wrote U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
The Supreme Court, however, recognized Congress’s power to fix time limits in Dillon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:09 pm
The following post is part of a Discussion Board about today’s decision in Medellin v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
The court's decision was simply that Congress lacked the enumerated power to regulate this behavior at all, and that dealing with such behavior should be left to the states (as with other noncommercial intrastate misbehavior, for instance the violence against women discussed in U.S. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
The court's decision was simply that Congress lacked the enumerated power to regulate this behavior at all, and that dealing with such behavior should be left to the states (as with other noncommercial intrastate misbehavior, for instance the violence against women discussed in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:30 am
See Snyder v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:17 am
Pear’s piece has provoked an ongoing avalanche of fervid reactions from both friends and foes of the King v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm
Shortly after Riegel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:27 pm
Supreme Court case in Golan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:20 am
However, the courts have allowed suits to be brought if two conditions are fulfilled: (i) Congress must have enacted “unequivocal statutory language” abrogating the States’ immunity from the suit; and (ii) some constitutional provision must allow Congress to have thus encroached on the States’ sovereignty. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:20 am
However, the courts have allowed suits to be brought if two conditions are fulfilled: (i) Congress must have enacted “unequivocal statutory language” abrogating the States’ immunity from the suit; and (ii) some constitutional provision must allow Congress to have thus encroached on the States’ sovereignty. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:20 am
However, the courts have allowed suits to be brought if two conditions are fulfilled: (i) Congress must have enacted “unequivocal statutory language” abrogating the States’ immunity from the suit; and (ii) some constitutional provision must allow Congress to have thus encroached on the States’ sovereignty. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:20 am
However, the courts have allowed suits to be brought if two conditions are fulfilled: (i) Congress must have enacted “unequivocal statutory language” abrogating the States’ immunity from the suit; and (ii) some constitutional provision must allow Congress to have thus encroached on the States’ sovereignty. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
In Figueroa v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 12:17 am
In March, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
