Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 1641 - 1660 of 9,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
State consumer protection statutes? [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:32 am by SW
  Leeds District Magistrates Court, the Defendant, did the same, the usual approach where a court is challenged. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:15 am by SHG
” When he says “we’ll have the ability to,” it stinks of Andrew Jackson’s purported reaction to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Worcester v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
In the Courts Australia Massoud v Ors [2021] NSWDC 336, District Court of New South Wales, the plaintiff was suspended and dismissed from his employment as a journalist for telling an 18 year old cadet that if he weren’t so young, the plaintiff would “rip his head off and shit down his throat. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
  On the first issue, the Court of Appeals notes that the Supreme Court in the landmark Heller v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court finds the Southern District of California's approach to Plaintiffs' similar requests persuasive …. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 7:21 am by John Floyd
Fazaga   The district court dismissed several of the plaintiffs’ claims after the Government argued that the “state secrets” doctrine prevented litigation. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
First, Bolton Metropolitan District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment (Practice Note) [1995] 1 WLR 1176, relied on by CPRE as establishing that where there is multiple representation in a planning appeal, the losing party will not normally be required to pay more than one set of costs, is as its title indicates a case providing guidance on practice. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4         The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States… [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am by Joel R. Brandes
New York, 2021) Petitioner Nir Velozny, an Israeli citizen, petitioned the United States District Court for the return of his children, R.V., N.V., and E.V., ages 15, 12, and 4, respectively, to Israel. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am by Joel R. Brandes
New York, 2021) Petitioner Nir Velozny, an Israeli citizen, petitioned the United States District Court for the return of his children, R.V., N.V., and E.V., ages 15, 12, and 4, respectively, to Israel. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
” The above hypothetical was very much analogous to the school district asbestos property damage class action, in which some plaintiffs’ counsel sought to hold all defendants jointly and severally liable. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 1:56 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Frasier sued in district court, arguing that the officers violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for filming them. [read post]