Search for: "State v. Gregory" Results 1641 - 1660 of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
White (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, October 8, 2021 Tags: Capital allocation, Executive Compensation, Liquidity, Market conditions, Repurchases, Shareholder value SEC Form 10-K Comments Regarding Climate-Related Disclosures Posted by Brian V. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:28 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
According to Gregory Poling at the Asia-Maritime Transparency Initiative, China is using Whitsun Reef as “a parking lot—their preferred anchorage to keep an eye on the larger piece of real estate called Union Banks. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 10:44 am
Gregory “voted to grant appellant a stay of execution until the Supreme Court decides Baze v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
Gregory, No. 07-3126 "In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit alleging that state university officials had retaliated against plaintiff for exercising his First Amendment rights when he complained about the university's use of grant funds, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where plaintiff's complaints were made in his capacity as an employee and were therefore not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Stephen Bilkis
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:49 am by David Markus
” The circuit judges followed with a ruling two weeks ago in the securities fraud case of United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am by Yishai Schwartz
Following the events of Nov. 13 summarized in the last post in this series, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened on Tuesday, Nov. 14 to continue testimony and the “preadmission” of evidence relating to physical evidence from the site of the attack on the USS Cole, identified as Appellate Exhibit 207. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Thomas Key
In chapter 23, Gregory Dale presents the artist turned criminal, noting that the emotions evoked in the audience may lead to the condemnation of the artist or celebration in spite of the crimes. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
Stawski claimed rights to his marks in nine states, as an exception to John Gregory Lawson's registration for the mark PROSPER for wines, but Stawski failed to show prior, lawful use of his marks (and he also failed to prove that confusion is not likely). [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:22 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Nick also analyzed how the iPhone’s TouchID feature intersects with the concept of a warrantless search as was determined in Riley v. [read post]