Search for: "State v. Harding"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 18,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
The official version was that the police found illegal software on the newspaper’s computers, and that this justified the seizure of the hard disks in the newspaper’s office. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 3:11 pm
Cambridge Literary v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
Another case, Duncan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:25 am
Additional Resources: United States of America v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 11:29 am
Douglas Carlson submits a FOIA request that wants to know the addresses and hours and final collection times for all of the post offices in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
See Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:19 am
When Scott v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:09 am
Well, except for the fact that Illinois v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:34 pm
” State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:22 pm
In practical terms, it's another Nokia v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 12:09 pm
It would have been preferable to give the Apple v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:24 pm
So I was extremely interested to see a similar ruling out of the New York State Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
Schreiber v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm
The complaint alleges that containers sold outside California are transported into California and redeemed at recycling centers like those operated by plaintiffs, and this exposes plaintiffs to state regulatory fines and penalties, risks rendering the “California Beverage Recycling Fund” insolvent, and thereby risks the economic viability of plaintiffs’ recycling businesses. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:51 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:44 pm
At the bottom of page 326 in this opinion today, Judge Betty Fletcher uses "sur-reply" when describing the response of the United States to the reply brief of the defendant. [read post]
