Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 7,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2010, 11:05 pm
After Kelo v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:06 am
Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.comTaken from SCOTUSBlog.com Holder v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm
It would be simpler for a patent holder to just use the U.S. patent to cover foreign activity. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
"In his famous and highly influential concurrence in eBay v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:53 pm
In Tyler v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:42 am
Urban Outfitters Inc. et al (Case number 1:12-cv-00195).Professor Ewelukwa concluded by stating that there are several questions which Africans and Nigerians must ask viz: What are the IP needs and expectations of holders of traditional knowledge/cultural property? [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
Theatre District Realty Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
A New York federal judge's summary judgment ruling last week held that although phonographophiles may unload their LPs at yard sales, a company that served as an online marketplace for used digital music infringed on the copyright of a record company.United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Richard Sullivan's 19-page decision in Capitol Records LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 3:00 am
R. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 9:05 am
Why didn't Jefferson, Secretary of State Madison, or another executive official simply fire Marbury? [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:49 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week in Herb Reed Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 7:42 pm
Microsoft Corporation v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 6:00 am
State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519, 528 (1983); see also Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:28 am
Last week, in Matter of Cale v Commissioner of Labor, 2007 NY Slip Op 09850, the Third Department held that if the professional position is eliminated by the employer the TN visa holder may not receive New York State unemployment insurance benefits. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:06 am
Therefore, it would be unlawful and unfair to have ISP/IBPs bear the costs of [expensive] blocking injunctions whilst right holders have other [cheaper!] [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
Holder, and Evenwel v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:25 am
This has more recently been reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
